-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:12:11 +0100
Bryce <bryce(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
On 17/09/12 21:26, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> No one currently is working on Fedora SPARC, and hasnt been for
> quite some time. we would need to get gcc-4.7 bootstrapped as well
> as a few other bits and pieces. its work that I just do not have
> the time to do, I also do not have the interest that I used to
> have. I think its a bit of a disservice to say that Fedora SPARC is
> a secondary arch at this point. If people do not step up to get
> things fixed and working im planning to take down the SPARC koji
> instance and remove sparc support from fedora-packager.
I'd have replied sooner but I'd to go get a number of mandates and
Anyway that is all done. I and other folk at oracle can now formally
assist. Gcc bootstrapping and a fixed up toolchain? We can do for you
32/64bit, kernel we have in house folk that can help with.
What kind of resources are available? SPARC as a secondary arch needs
at least 1 probably more people to do pretty much full time work on it.
buildserver wise we only have a T2000 thats useable, the T1000 randomly
drops to OBP. maybe you can drop into #fedora-sparc on freenode and we
could discuss what is needed?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----