[spin-kickstarts] #18: fedora-livedvd-developer.ks fails to compose
by fedora-badges
#18: fedora-livedvd-developer.ks fails to compose
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
Reporter: rishi | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: Fedora 10 GA
Component: fedora-developer | Keywords:
------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
fedora-livedvd-developer.ks contains sysprof, which has been removed from
Fedora to Livna because it needs a kernel module. Due to this the spin
fails to compose.
The attached patch fixes this issue.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/ticket/18>
spin-kickstarts <https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/>
Kickstarts that the Spin SIG reviews, tests, maintains and releases (as a package).
14 years, 9 months
Missing dep in Electronic Lab for F-10
by Jeroen van Meeuwen
The electronic lab spin has a missing dependency in Fedora 10. People
using the kickstart in spin-kickstarts now do not get a valid .iso file.
kde-plasma-lancelot-1.0.3-1.fc10.x86_64 from fedora has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libplasma.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package
kde-plasma-lancelot-1.0.3-1.fc10.x86_64 (fedora)
Unable to resolve dependencies for some packages selected:
Missing Dependency: libplasma.so.2()(64bit) is needed by package
kde-plasma-lancelot-1.0.3-1.fc10.x86_64 (fedora)
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
14 years, 9 months
LiveCD Twister
by Jeroen van Meeuwen
Hey there,
I wanna take a few spins for a quick vote;
== The Education Spin ==
My primary concern about maybe not being able to override --instLangs
from within a localized kickstart inheriting this kickstart is lifted;
it works like a charm. There are no further objections to this spin but
concern over the reason as to why the spin needs to save so much space
(yet ship two desktop environments).
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Education_Spin
This one gets a +1 from me.
== The BrOffice.org Spin ==
Just changed to use --instLangs en_US:pt_BR ;-) This has been a spin for
Fedora 10 and should thus go through very smoothly.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BrOffice.org_Spin
This one also gets a +1 from me.
== The Games Spin ==
No further introduction needed. This spin however is still in
Category:Incomplete_Spins !!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games_Spin
This one... apparently isn't ready to get any votes yet, but I wanted to
mention it anyway.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
14 years, 9 months
Withdrawing the Sugar Spin
by Sebastian Dziallas
Hi everybody,
I'd like to announce the retraction of the Sugar Spin [1] for F11 (and
other releases). It's development won't be ceased, but merged into
SugarLabs 'Sugar on a Stick' project [2], since we don't want to confuse
our users with having various, almost identical version around.
Because of that, the fedora-livecd-sugar.ks, as well as the images being
hosted right now, can and will be removed soonish.
If you've any questions, please feel free to direct them to me or the
Sugar Development mailing list.
Thanks,
--Sebastian
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Sugar_Spin
[2] http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick
14 years, 9 months
change to spins template
by John Poelstra
Just looking here and reviewing the spins waiting for review and I've
noticed that we don't call out the release the spin is targeted for.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_New_Spin_Page_Template
I think we we should add the targeted release to the template. In
addition, for simplicity sake and permanent URL reference we should also
create a new feature page for each major Fedora release, instead of
constantly rolling the pages forward.
Looking at this particular page I can't really tell what release a spin
owner is targeting.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AOS_Spin
the suggested ISO names contain Fedora-10 which would seem odd if it is
for the Fedora 11 release, but yet I can't tell :)
John
14 years, 9 months
