Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>>> The -logos package in the creation of installation media gets chosen by
>>> product name, nowadays. You cannot pick a specific -logos package for
>>> the installer images build process to use although that was the first
>>> patch I attempted to get into anaconda.
>>>
>>> I can see the added value of having a remix-logos, but it's name is
>>> shorter then "fedora-logos" so I'm afraid it might start
winning some
>>> yum-best-package selections.
>> Is this affecting pungi or livecd-tools as well? I assume I can still
>> exclude fedora-logos and include remix-logos in a kickstart file for
>> live cds. If it does affect live image creation, what is the recommended
>> method to rebrand Fedora now?
>>
> The change in anaconda behaviour is affecting revisor and pungi, or
> actually installation media compose processes in general. That's a
> separate issue.
>
> My concern with regards to dependency resolving is that if you do not
> explicitly say you want fedora-logos, you end up with remix-logos being
> pulled in as the best provider for system-logos. So, this concern really
> applies to the situation in which one would not want to rebrand.
Well, ideally people would be inheriting the base ks file and getting it
automatically but if that is a real concern, let's call it
fedora-remix-logos and that name won't be the shortest anymore.
Still a little patching would be required for anaconda I believe, to
substitute spaces in the product name to a '-'. Either way,
fedora-remix-logos seems to have a better chance! ;-)
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip