On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 08:44:50 +0100,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What I would like is a much better defined spin process. I've been
> involved in the spin process for 2 releases now, managed to miss the
> boat with F-12 because there was no where on the spin process and no
> prior announcements to cut off dates. I actually made it in with 2
> spins this process (maintain moblin, co-maintain sugar on a stick) but
> it was certainly not without issues.
Peter, are you interested in leading the Spins SIG? There are a few of us
that don't want to lead the team but are willing to help. In the past we
have volunteered to do needed tasks and I think you could expect us to
continue doing so going forward.
Its something I would consider but its something that I don't believe
I will have the time to dedicate to properly in the next release
cycle. I've just moved to a more senior core infrastructure role in my
current company and have a massive schedule over the next 6 months or
so. Depending on how that all settles out and if no one is willing to
step up to the plate I may re-consider it for the F-15 release cycle.
I might also have more of a clue about the process by then :-P
Peter