Bryan Kearney wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>> Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>> I'm late and not as educated a remixer myself. I'm running a
>>> livecd-creator process right now to see what happens in the generic-*
>>> case. Would it make sense to have the Fedora Remix logos appear in
>>> the generic-logos package by default?
>>>
>> In my opinion, we should have a generic package that just debrands.
> Don't we have already have that with generic-logos? My opinion is that
> by making available fedora-remix-logos, we can encourage remixes to give
> Fedora credit which is the whole point of the secondary brand.
>
> Rahul
Yes.. so three logo packages, and you only include one:
fedora-logos
generic-logos
fedora-remix-logos
I don't know what you mean by saying I only include one. You appear
confused. To be clear, there is only two logos packages currently.
fedora-logos and generic-logos and I am proposing, we have a third one,
fedora-remix-logos. Read my first post.
Rahul