On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Christoph Wickert
<christoph.wickert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 09.04.2013, 17:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Joerg Simon (jsimon(a)fedoraproject.org) said:
> > can you please give us a feedback regarding
> >
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/2013-April/002886.html
>
> I am not the spin wrangler - I merely created the F19 spins page as a copy
> of F18 because someone from QA asked me to so they had size targets, etc.
>
> CC'ing Christoph, he can likely give you a better answer.
I agree with Bill that
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/19/Spins
should be considered the authoritative list of spins. There is no reason
to only go for the desktop spins and exclude old spins from reoccurrence
if they are actively maintained.
In addition to that, we have some spins listed as ready for SIG:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Spins_Ready_For_SIG
I have no idea, why some of the spins are there:
* Design Suite was around for ages and is now actively maintained
again.
* Same for the Games spin.
* Fedora jam was approved be the SIG in the F18 cycle but didn't
make it.
* Java spin is new, afaik it was not yet approved. The owner seems
unresponsive at least he has not responded to my questions in
the wiki since December. Also, the board had some issues with
the name.
The Java spin can't be called the Java spin due to trademark issues so
if it does happen it'll have to be called something else, I can
remember this going to the board last cycle.
Peter