Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> The Spins SIG is going to have regular, bi-weekly meetings. I've chosen
> Mondays at 18:00 UTC, on even weeks, and it will not take more then one
> Obviously, we can pre-discuss most of the items on the agenda on our
> mailing list fedora-spins -at- lists.fedoraproject.org
> With help of several key people in the current Spins process, including
> Process-Guru and current Feature Wrangler John Poelstra, we've come up
> with a real Spins Process during this last FUDCon.
> If you are a member of Release Engineering, Quality Assurance, FESCo or
> Infrastructure, I would like you to attend.
> Our first meeting (in the series of regular meetings) would be January
> 19th, 18:00 UTC, for which I'm going to set the Agenda now:
> == Agenda ==
> # Finalizing Spins Process, vote
May I suggest part of this discussion is spin versus feature. I ask
becuase the process (for me) got hairy when combined with the feature
Hopefully we cleared this part up at Friday's hackfest discussion. Now
1) Spins for a particular release
2) Features for a particular release
o #1 and #2 are NOT the same thing.
o #2 already has a formal process--parts of it have been borrowed to
create a *separate* process for #1
o I am the wrangler for #2. I'm leaning in the direction of volunteering
to be the wrangler for #1
We should have some wiki pages and diagrams explaining the proposed
spins process soon.
Bryan--we looked at your design on the wiki as part of our discussions.