Re: [Fedora-spins] haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

[June 2009]
>  I would like to argue once more for separate packages in
>  the Fedora distribution; nevermind the actual names of the packages
>  I'm using here, those are open for debate; 
>  = spin-kickstarts (or rather; fedora-kickstarts) = 
>  = fedora-kickstarts-extra = 
Any update here?  Is a Haskell spin .ks ever going to be in SCM or some package?

How about subpackaging for now?

Jens

haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 22:52:00 -0400,
  Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  [June 2009]
>  > I would like to argue once more for separate packages in
>  > the Fedora distribution; nevermind the actual names of the packages
>  > I'm using here, those are open for debate;
>  
>  > = spin-kickstarts (or rather; fedora-kickstarts) =
>  
>  > = fedora-kickstarts-extra =
>  
>  Any update here?  Is a Haskell spin .ks ever going to be in SCM or some package? 
I don't know about the Haskell spin, but there is now a way for spins to
be in git without being published as ISOs. For example the QA Test Day spin.
It still would need to go through the Spins process as far as being approved
the the SIG.

haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

>  > Any update here?  Is a Haskell spin .ks ever going to be in SCM
> or
>  some package?
>  
>  I don't know about the Haskell spin, but there is now a way for spins
>  to be in git without being published as ISOs. 
Cool  (I thought there already were some.:)

>  It still would need to go through the Spins process as far as being
>  approved the the SIG. 
So what is the next step then? :)

Jens

haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts

[Bruno Wolff III]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:02:17 -0400,
  Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  > > Any update here?  Is a Haskell spin .ks ever going to be in
> SCM or
>  > some package?
>  > 
>  > I don't know about the Haskell spin, but there is now a way for spins
>  > to be in git without being published as ISOs.
>  
>  Cool  (I thought there already were some.:)
>  
>  > It still would need to go through the Spins process as far as being
>  > approved the the SIG.
>  
>  So what is the next step then? :) 
You should be able to follow:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process

If there are unclear parts, let us know so we can improve that document.
When you do the spin template there are a few things for published spins
that don't make a lot of sense for ones that will just be in git. Yours
would be just the second spin like that, so some things aren't aren't
spelled out as well for those cases.

haskell spin submission for spin-kickstarts

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

>  You should be able to follow:
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_Process 
Thanks - I had overlooked the Talk comments... :-/

Hope we can get this to move now :)

Jens