sssd-devel December 2016

sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

15 participants
53 discussions

[sssd PR#104][opened] Suppress a confusing error message from timestamp cache updates
by fidencio 08 Dec '16

08 Dec '16

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/104 Author: jhrozek Title: #104: Suppress a confusing error message from timestamp cache updates Action: opened PR body: """ 0 is not an error, let's use a second variable instead to track the timestamp update retval and only emit a MINOR-level failure if that one is set. """ To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/104/head:pr104 git checkout pr104

1 7

[sssd PR#105][opened] RESPONDER: Remove dead assignment to the variable ret
by fidencio 08 Dec '16

08 Dec '16

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/105 Author: lslebodn Title: #105: RESPONDER: Remove dead assignment to the variable ret Action: opened PR body: """ """ To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/105/head:pr105 git checkout pr105

1 6

Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds #100
by amit kumar 07 Dec '16

07 Dec '16

Hi, https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/100 I am planning to use this: Note that lowest possible value is 60 seconds in-case if value is provided less than 60, parameter will assume lowest value only. Thanks

1 0

Feedback About probable Fix for sssd/ticket/1149
by amit kumar 07 Dec '16

07 Dec '16

Hello, _https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1149 _Yes replacement of talloc_get_type() with talloc_get_type_abort() is good move, reasons mentioned in description. Current sssd contains 773 occurrences of talloc_get_type. I suppose Fix is: Replacing all 773 occurrences with talloc_get_type_abort(). Sanity Test: 1. # make intgchk 2. Use case: Configuring AD trust using sssd. My Queries: 1. Is Fix correct? 2. Does any other specific/corner test-case is required? Thanks

2 1

[sssd PR#93][opened] SSH: Use default_domain_suffix for users' authorized keys
by fidencio 06 Dec '16

06 Dec '16

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/93 Author: jhrozek Title: #93: SSH: Use default_domain_suffix for users' authorized keys Action: opened PR body: """ None """ To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/93/head:pr93 git checkout pr93

1 11

Unable to login with SSH
by E. Clapton 06 Dec '16

06 Dec '16

I'm trying to connect my server to a LDAP server. I get a correct answer after using *id* and *ldapsearch* commands. However, i still not able to login with SSH. I can see on sssd_LDAP.log file that the server has received the request to login with the user (myuser), but the request was rejected. tail -f /var/log/sssd/sssd_LDAP.log (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_get_account_info] (0x0200): Got request for [0x1001][FAST BE_REQ_USER][1][name=omri_w] (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [fo_resolve_service_send] (0x0100): Trying to resolve service 'LDAP' (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [get_server_status] (0x0100): Hostname resolution expired, resetting the server status of 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [set_server_common_status] (0x0100): Marking server 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' as 'name not resolved' (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [resolv_gethostbyname_files_send] (0x0100): Trying to resolve A record of 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' in files (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [set_server_common_status] (0x0100): Marking server 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' as 'resolving name' (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [resolv_gethostbyname_files_send] (0x0100): Trying to resolve AAAA record of 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' in files (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [resolv_gethostbyname_next] (0x0200): No more address families to retry (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [resolv_gethostbyname_dns_query] (0x0100): Trying to resolve A record of 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' in DNS (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [set_server_common_status] (0x0100): Marking server 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' as 'name resolved' (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_resolve_server_process] (0x0200): Found address for server ldap21v.walla.co.il: [192.168.50.21] TTL 600 (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [sdap_get_server_opts_from_rootdse] (0x0020): ldap_rootdse_last_usn configured but not found in rootdse! (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [sdap_cli_auth_step] (0x0100): expire timeout is 900 (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [fo_set_port_status] (0x0100): Marking port 389 of server 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' as 'working' (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [set_server_common_status] (0x0100): Marking server 'ldap21v.walla.co.il' as 'working' (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [acctinfo_callback] (0x0100): Request processed. Returned 0,0,Success (Success) (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_get_account_info] (0x0200): Got request for [0x1003][FAST BE_REQ_INITGROUPS][1][name=myuser] (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [sdap_initgr_nested_send] (0x0100): User entry lacks original memberof ? (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [acctinfo_callback] (0x0100): Request processed. Returned 0,0,Success (Success) (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_get_account_info] (0x0200): Got request for [0x3][BE_REQ_INITGROUPS][1][name=myuser] (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [sdap_initgr_nested_send] (0x0100): User entry lacks original memberof ? (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [acctinfo_callback] (0x0100): Request processed. Returned 0,0,Success (Success) (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_pam_handler] (0x0100): Got request with the following data (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): command: SSS_PAM_AUTHENTICATE (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): domain: LDAP (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): user: myuser (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): service: sshd (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): tty: ssh (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): ruser: (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): rhost: 192.118.68.5 (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): authtok type: 0 (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): newauthtok type: 0 (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): priv: 1 (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): cli_pid: 2208 (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): logon name: not set (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_pam_handler_callback] (0x0100): Backend returned: (0, 7, <NULL>) [Success (Authentication failure)] (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_pam_handler_callback] (0x0100): Sending result [7][LDAP] (Mon Dec 5 12:39:48 2016) [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [be_pam_handler_callback] (0x0100): Sent result [7][LDAP] Does anyone know what is the issue?

2 4

[sssd PR#98][closed] Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds
by fidencio 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/98 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #98: Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/98/head:pr98 git checkout pr98

1 0

[sssd PR#98][comment] Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds
by fidencio 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/98 Title: #98: Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds lslebodn commented: """ Closing because there is a new pull request #100 for the same change. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/98#issuecomment-264837647

1 0

[sssd PR#98][+Rejected] Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds
by fidencio 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/98 Title: #98: Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds Label: +Rejected

1 0

[sssd PR#98][-Changes requested] Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds
by fidencio 05 Dec '16

05 Dec '16

URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/98 Title: #98: Changes done in man for case when dyndns_refresh_interval is specified < 60 seconds Label: -Changes requested

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

sssd-devel December 2016