On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 10:42:18AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 09:52:17AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This bug was found by Sumit. When I split resolv_get_sockaddr_address_index and resolv_get_sockaddr_address and actually didn't use the index parameter anywhere.
ACK, I only have I nano-nitpick, you might want to consider to rename index to addrindex in async_resolv.h as well, but this is purely cosmetically.
bye, Sumit
You're right, I have squashed in the following change before pushing the patch:
diff --git a/src/resolv/async_resolv.h b/src/resolv/async_resolv.h index dd8e9de..a820788 100644 --- a/src/resolv/async_resolv.h +++ b/src/resolv/async_resolv.h @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ resolv_get_string_ptr_address(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct sockaddr_storage * resolv_get_sockaddr_address_index(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct resolv_hostent *hostent, - int port, int index); + int port, int addrindex);