[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] Changes to allow SSSD to be used for access control with a machine account belonging to a domain controller.
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:55:05AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (26/11/15 16:51), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 04:46:07PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:47:13PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:53:46AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I'm resending a patch for ticket #2870 on behalf of the original
>> > > reporter who also kindly submitted a patch.
>> > >
>> > > The patch looks good to me, as soon as we fix CI, I'll submit it
as well
>> > > and I think we can push it..
>> >
>> > > From 79e3fe4052b0bdb0ca6b9c62686cacb581df0044 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
>> > > From: Mathieu Deaudelin-Lemay <contrib(a)mdeaudelin.net>
>> > > Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:56:11 -0500
>> > > Subject: [PATCH] Changes to allow SSSD to be used for access control
with a
>> > > machine account belonging to a domain controller.
>> >
>> > CI passed:
>> > http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/33/92/summary.html
>> >
>> > Conceptually the patch was already agreen on by Simo in the ticket. The
>> > code looks good to me as well, so if there is no opposition, I'll push
>> > it.
>>
>> I checked that the value of UAC_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT is the right one.
>> Since you already run the CI I'd say ACK.
>>
>> bye,
>> Sumit
>
>Thank you for checking, pushed with your RB:
> 5c129880ae10c80b4f79cb2994e9d127dc6dfbef
Is there a reason why this patch could not be in stable branch?
Timo asked it on #sssd.
No, just push it.