On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:55 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 03/06/2012 03:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
The ding-libs development on master has been virtually stagnant for many
months now. Much of what is included on the master branch is
partially-completed concept work that was originally going to be done as
part of a nebulous 1.0 future.
Given that the ding-libs 1.0 has been effectively abandoned (and that
the ding_libs-0-1 branch has been remarkably stable for a long time),
I'd like to recommend that we branch the current master off (perhaps
name it 'experimental') and then reset the master branch to be identical
to the current contents of ding_libs-0-1.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
I would not rush with it frankly but for a different reason. The
libcollection is now being evaluated as a mean for doing internal
implementation of the structured logging. I have couple patches for it
that I need to polish and submit. I plan to do it in couple weeks.
Until we sort out the fate and use of libcollection I do not think it
makes sense to do the reorganization of otherwise stable tree.
Well, that's my point. The code in master is currently not stable. Some
of it is still work-in-progress for features that were never completed.
I'd rather see us make changes atop the known-stable tree and abandon
these ill-fated forays.
Also we need to get someone continuing the work in this area and
finish the work on the INI and bring it to the final release. There is
not much left but should be enough for thesis. I can work with Jan on
that.
I don't see how it's easier to base this off of a broken master than it
is off of a stable branch.