-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01/11/2010 10:07 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:54 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Address
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/349
>
>
> After a bit of thought, I decided to break this into two separate
> patches to make it more clear. New patches attached.
>
> Patch 0002: Remove the explicit defaults where they're unneeded.
> Patch 0003: Implement the mandatory flag as in the previous patch.
Is the mandatory flag really the way how to proceed with the authconfig?
Will there be a short summary of the Friday authconfig SSSD UI meeting
posted somewhere?
Yeah, as I mentioned in my other reply, I think this is no longer the
correct approach.
I'm withdrawing this and I want to work from the results of that
meeting. I will ping the other attendants about the notes.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAktLQUMACgkQeiVVYja6o6PlkgCfaAgFUW+ObgQpSUucr8u3YqFt
MegAoLH2rjJYj26GbnAimZa26Kf9Sl37
=3acF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----