On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 19:54 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
When working on the SELinux code lately, I found out that all the functions from sss_selinux.c are consumed by ipa_selinux.c only. I don't think it makes sense to have a sss_selinux.c module in the util/ tree, so I simply merged the functions into ipa_selinux.
Wouldn't this require to branch them off again if the GPO work will allow us to store selinux maps in AD too ?
Simo.