Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] sudo: use "higher value wins" when ordering rules

[Lukas Slebodnik]

On (04/08/15 18:54), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:05:56PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2682
> >
> > I think this option should stay undocumented since we want the users to use
> > the correct sorting logic.
>
> I agree.
> > From db18a64109d9e49fa8bcdad14f412c6e7159137d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?= 
> > Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:51:30 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] sudo: use "higher value wins" when ordering rules
> >
> > This commit changes the default ordering logic (lower value wins) to
> > a correct one that is used by native ldap support. It also adds a new
> > option sudo_inverse_order to switch to the original SSSD (incorrect)
> > behaviour if needed.
>
> Did you already build a test RPM for the RHEL customer who reported the
> bug? If not, please do so and let them confirm the fix.
>
> One comment in the code:
> > @@ -680,7 +684,7 @@ static errno_t sudosrv_get_sudorules_query_cache(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
> >          goto done;
> >      }
> > ret = sort_sudo_rules(rules, count);
> > ret = sort_sudo_rules(rules, count, inverse_order == false);
>
> This is unreadable to me, because == false passes true to the function.
> I would prefer:
>    inverse_order ? false : true

Neither proposed solution nor original version improve readability.

The prototype of sort_sudo_rules is:
static errno_t
sort_sudo_rules(struct sysdb_attrs **rules, size_t count, bool higher_wins);

The most readable version is:

const higher_wins = !inverse_order
    ret = sort_sudo_rules(rules, count, higher_wins);

or to change loginc in function sort_sudo_rules.

LS