On (07/06/16 15:13), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 03:11:49PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:42:56PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:32:20PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > oops, yes I guess this would be a good idea. I'll send a new
patch.
> > > >
> > >
> > > new version attached.
> > >
> > > bye,
> > > Sumit
> >
> > One last question, do we want to add the ocsp_default_responder and
> > ocsp_default_responder_signing_cert options to configAPI?
>
> No, because I think the configAPI is currently not capable of this
> because both are only allowed options to certificate_verification as
> e.g. no_ocsp or no_verification.
OK, makes sense.
Thank you, ACK.
master:
* 53ef8f81b60929a6c866efdd133627e7d7d61705
* aa35995ef056aa8ae052a47c62c6750b7adf065e
* 875c90d531e6869a92da4b515db729ffce7c4244
LS