On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 09:38:14AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 13:25 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> I have include the check in the sss_client directory, but I'm
> to add it to common, too. IMO the maintainers of the packages should
> decide if errno_t makes sense for them or not. A second argument would
> be that in most cases there is no private header file where the
> can be added.
I can't do a successful build with this patch, it says errno_t is
re-defined in sss_cli.h when parsing util.h
Does it depend on other patches ?
Can you check it again against current master ?
ah, sorry, the new patch contains a protection against double inclusion
of the typedef.