Problem or not?

[Jeff Schroeder]

I've built this package for Fedora 10 and am testing it out.
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sssd/0.7.1/1.fc12/src/sssd-0.7.1-...

In /var/log/sssd/sssd.log:
[sssd[be[LDAP]]] [load_backend_module] (0): Unable to load init fn
sssm_ldap_access_init from module ldap, error:
/usr/lib64/sssd/libsss_ldap.so: undefined symbol:
sssm_ldap_access_init

Is this a problem? Authentication appears to be working but I'm not
sure 100% as that can't be good.

[Sumit Bose]

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:54:19PM -0700, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> I've built this package for Fedora 10 and am testing it out.
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sssd/0.7.1/1.fc12/src/sssd-0.7.1-...
>
> In /var/log/sssd/sssd.log:
> [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [load_backend_module] (0): Unable to load init fn
> sssm_ldap_access_init from module ldap, error:
> /usr/lib64/sssd/libsss_ldap.so: undefined symbol:
> sssm_ldap_access_init
>
> Is this a problem? Authentication appears to be working but I'm not
> sure 100% as that can't be good.

This is just a warning. There is already a bug filed to make this message less irritating.

bye,
Sumit
> -- 
> Jeff Schroeder
>
> Don't drink and derive, alcohol and analysis don't mix.
> http://www.digitalprognosis.com
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/30/2009 04:54 PM, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> I've built this package for Fedora 10 and am testing it out.
> http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/sssd/0.7.1/1.fc12/src/sssd-0.7.1-...
>
> In /var/log/sssd/sssd.log:
> [sssd[be[LDAP]]] [load_backend_module] (0): Unable to load init fn
> sssm_ldap_access_init from module ldap, error:
> /usr/lib64/sssd/libsss_ldap.so: undefined symbol:
> sssm_ldap_access_init
>
> Is this a problem? Authentication appears to be working but I'm not
> sure 100% as that can't be good.

Please see https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/251

This is a known issue, but a harmless one.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkruzF8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6Nv1ACfSeKWkwXkuNULrjX2NR2FtJ3a
> wd4An3VrWojg7AJqeTzjV69vsKdxXV0F
> =FqmE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----