On 06/25/2010 09:47 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I realized today that the RPM packages for SSSD had the wrong version
> for libini_config. The upstream project revision was 0.4.0, but we
> were building RPMs that claimed it was 0.5.0. To further confuse
> things, in the master branch we actually HAD bumped to 0.5.0 (with a
> soname bump as well).
>
> In order to fix this, I've attached patches to rev the version of
> libini_config in SSSD 1.2 to the version of 0.5.1, and we will rename
> the soname bumped version in master to 0.6.0.
>
> The reason for going with 0.5.1 is to guarantee that upgrades occur
> cleanly (in case someone had inadvertently installed a 0.5.0 package
> from master, which would be incompatible).
>
>
> The attached patches are as follows:
> 0001-Drop-release-requirement-from-versions.patch:
> There's no reason that we should be requiring a specific release
> number for the subpackages, since we always rev the version number
> when interfaces are added.
>
>
> 0002-Bump-libini_config-version-to-0.5.1.patch (sssd-1-2 only):
> Bump the 1.2 branch version to 0.5.1
>
> 0002-Bump-libini_config-version-to-0.6.0.patch:
> Bump the master branch version to 0.6.0
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Visual ack.
Pushed to master and sssd-1-2 (as appropriate).
--
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/