On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 01:32:27PM +1000, David O'Brien wrote:
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/18/2009 03:30 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:18:48 -0500
>> Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We forgot the LOCAL provider when we added support for
>>> PAM_PRELIM_CHECK.
>>>
>> ACK
>>
>> Simo.
>>
>
> Pushed to master and 1-0-0.
>
What's the doc impact or how do I use/test this?
There is no impact on the docs. The change only affect how a password
change request is processed internally. You can test it by trying to
change a password of a local user. If it works everything is fine, id it
fails either this patch is not applied or something else is broken.
I have changed the way change password request are handled because of
#326. In the patch for #326 I have changed the proxy, ldap and kerberos
provider but forgot LOCAL.
The visible change of #326 is the immediate response of the passwd
command if the user provives a wrong 'old' password. Without the patch
the user was asked for the old and the new password and only after
entering both he got a response if the old password was wrong.
bye,
Sumit
--
David O'Brien
Red Hat Asia Pacific
+61 7 3514 8189
He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains
a fool forever."
~ Chinese proverb
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel