On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 16:35 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi guys,
I would like to report this packaging(?) problem.
As you can see in the following output, there's not a dependency
between the rpm libsss_autofs and sssd.
You're right. Looks like we're (incorrectly) including libsss_autofs.so
in both the 'sssd' and 'libsss_autofs' packages. As a result, we're
not
causing an implicit update of libsss_autofs and they're conflicting.
I'll get out an update right away. Thanks for reporting this!