[PATCH] UTIL: Fix warning Wmissing-braces

[Lukas Slebodnik]

ehlo,

Older versions of gcc does not like initialisation of struct sigevent
because the first member of structure is union (sigval_t).

Simple patch is attached.

LS

[Sumit Bose]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:28:05AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> Older versions of gcc does not like initialisation of struct sigevent
> because the first member of structure is union (sigval_t).
>
> Simple patch is attached.
>
> LS

The warning is gone, just waiting for CI to finish ....

bye,
Sumit

[Sumit Bose]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:32:57AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:28:05AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > ehlo,
> >
> > Older versions of gcc does not like initialisation of struct sigevent
> > because the first member of structure is union (sigval_t).
> >
> > Simple patch is attached.
> >
> > LS
>
> The warning is gone, just waiting for CI to finish ....

http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/47/12/summary.html

the failures are looking unrelated to me, so ACK.

bye,
Sumit
> bye,
> Sumit
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]

[Lukas Slebodnik]

On (01/07/16 10:28), Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:32:57AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:28:05AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > ehlo,
> > >
> > > Older versions of gcc does not like initialisation of struct sigevent
> > > because the first member of structure is union (sigval_t).
> > >
> > > Simple patch is attached.
> > >
> > > LS
> >
> > The warning is gone, just waiting for CI to finish ....
>
> http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/47/12/summary.html
>
> the failures are looking unrelated to me, so ACK.

thank you for fast review

master:
* 3e81e71124c75fd8709704e38561fa1f9d5bfbc2

LS

[Lukas Slebodnik]

On (01/07/16 10:55), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (01/07/16 10:28), Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:32:57AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 08:28:05AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > > > ehlo,
> > > >
> > > > Older versions of gcc does not like initialisation of struct sigevent
> > > > because the first member of structure is union (sigval_t).
> > > >
> > > > Simple patch is attached.
> > > >
> > > > LS
> > >
> > > The warning is gone, just waiting for CI to finish ....
> >
> > http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/47/12/summary.html
> >
> > the failures are looking unrelated to me, so ACK.
>
> thank you for fast review
>
> master:
> 3e81e71124c75fd8709704e38561fa1f9d5bfbc2

ehm,
wrong hash.

master:
* 8a1ad2a2cc489c202092af321f4c4a9787802ed6

LS