As of now SSSD is pretty much the most stable software I'm working with, so no extra
patches from me at this moment.
Have a nice day!
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (19/06/15 14:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>> We have 19 patches in 1.11 branch on top of latest release (1.11.7)
>>>> I went through bugs filed against 1.11 branch and filter
>>>> crashes and the most important bugs.
>>>> Attached are cherrry-picked patches from 1.12/master
>>>> So we can release the latest 1.11 version. It will be just a bug-fix
>>>> So some conservative distribution can use it or in another words.
>>>> we don't want have 1.11 branch neither in unreleased not in unclosed
>>>> BTW I test packages with LDAP KRB5 and AD test. Of course there are any
>>>> regressions because it is a bug fix only release.
>>> I applied the patches and built the SRPM:
>>> It worked, so ACK..
>>> Do you want to push the patches and release the tarball?
>> Here is an updated patch set.
>> I tested it with ldap, krb5, proxy and ad provider.
>> and there were no failure. Except of missing features :-)
>> But I wanted to backport only crashes and bug-fixes.
>> If we do not want to include patch with negroup leak
>> then we can release latest 1.11 version.
> I would like to include the netgroups fix and also 52e3ee5c5ff2c5a per
> Timo's request on IRC.
> I looked at the patches' description and the list looks OK to me. I
> didn't look at the code at all to be honest, did you have to change a
> lot of patches so that they apply?
> Howard, does Suse carry any patches atop 1.11.x that you would like us
> to include so that you don't have to keep them?