On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 09:55 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 07:07:08PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > I am writing again with respect to the LDB matter
> > (
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/pipermail/sssd-devel/2012-June/010303.html )
> >
> > >There isn't really a workaround for it right now. The problem is that
> > >SSSD needs to build a plugin for LDB (our memberOf plugin) and because
> > >of a poor design decision in libldb, modules have to be rebuilt for
> > >every version number bump of the LDB library.
> >
> > Samba people are letting it be known that sssd is part of the problem:
> > memberof.so has the following code piece:
> >
> > int ldb_init_module(const char *version)
> > {
> > #ifdef LDB_MODULE_CHECK_VERSION
> > --> LDB_MODULE_CHECK_VERSION(version);
> > #endif
> > return ldb_register_module(&ldb_memberof_module_ops);
> > }
> >
> > If sssd's memberof.so really did not care about ldb-1.1.x vs ldb-1.1.y,
> > then it probably should not call LDB_MODULE_CHECK_VERSION in the
> > first place.
> >
> > (The samba part is at
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9495
> > comment 5.)
>
> And Simo summarized our thoughts in comment #6. There is no guarantee
> that memberof won't randomly break.
>
> I would be comfortable accepting the patch to remove the version check
> if there was some kind of automated way to run per-package tests in the
> Fedora build system. As far as I understand, only tests suitable for all
> packages (upgrade tests etc) are supported..
>
> Would it help for consumers of SSSD and by extension memberof if we made
> the check configurable during configure time? Then people like Jan who
> explicitly don't want the version check in the distribution they are
> running can simply configure with --disable-ldb-version check perhaps.
Works for me.
Simo.