Hi,
as we're planning what exactly are we going to work on in the next release and also preparing to move away from fedorahosted, I think it makes sense to clean up our Trac. The intent is to make our trac better searchable and reduce clutter.
First, I went through the Patches Welcome milestone and marked tickets that in my opinion should be just closed: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/report/35
These are tickets that either talk about enhancements to the local provider, do not have any useful information (example: a crash in the version we shipped in RHEL-6.1) or were simply filed as an idea many years ago but since then nobody stepped up to work on this ticket and nebody requested this work again, so the assumption is that nobody really needs that work.
Feel free to go through this list and push back if you disagree. For tickets where nobody complains about closing them, I will close them in a week from now. If somebody will disagree about closing these tickets, we can always reopen them..
As a next step if Trac cleanup, I will go through the 'Future releases' milestone and propose some tickets for moving into 'Patches welcome' or being closed right away.
On 11/17/2016 06:23 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
as we're planning what exactly are we going to work on in the next release and also preparing to move away from fedorahosted, I think it makes sense to clean up our Trac. The intent is to make our trac better searchable and reduce clutter.
First, I went through the Patches Welcome milestone and marked tickets that in my opinion should be just closed: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/report/35
These are tickets that either talk about enhancements to the local provider, do not have any useful information (example: a crash in the version we shipped in RHEL-6.1) or were simply filed as an idea many years ago but since then nobody stepped up to work on this ticket and nebody requested this work again, so the assumption is that nobody really needs that work.
Feel free to go through this list and push back if you disagree. For tickets where nobody complains about closing them, I will close them in a week from now. If somebody will disagree about closing these tickets, we can always reopen them..
As a next step if Trac cleanup, I will go through the 'Future releases' milestone and propose some tickets for moving into 'Patches welcome' or being closed right away.
+1
If I add the 'Created' field to the report listed on the Contribute wiki page for easyfixes, only 6 of the 34 cases are within the last year so it is difficult to know if these tickets are relevant anymore.
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/report/34
-Justin
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 08:36:40AM -0500, Justin Stephenson wrote:
On 11/17/2016 06:23 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
as we're planning what exactly are we going to work on in the next release and also preparing to move away from fedorahosted, I think it makes sense to clean up our Trac. The intent is to make our trac better searchable and reduce clutter.
First, I went through the Patches Welcome milestone and marked tickets that in my opinion should be just closed: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/report/35
These are tickets that either talk about enhancements to the local provider, do not have any useful information (example: a crash in the version we shipped in RHEL-6.1) or were simply filed as an idea many years ago but since then nobody stepped up to work on this ticket and nebody requested this work again, so the assumption is that nobody really needs that work.
Feel free to go through this list and push back if you disagree. For tickets where nobody complains about closing them, I will close them in a week from now. If somebody will disagree about closing these tickets, we can always reopen them..
As a next step if Trac cleanup, I will go through the 'Future releases' milestone and propose some tickets for moving into 'Patches welcome' or being closed right away.
+1
If I add the 'Created' field to the report listed on the Contribute wiki page for easyfixes, only 6 of the 34 cases are within the last year so it is difficult to know if these tickets are relevant anymore.
It's best to ask on a case-by-cases basis, but unless I flagged them in report #34, I think they still are relevant.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:23:24PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
as we're planning what exactly are we going to work on in the next release and also preparing to move away from fedorahosted, I think it makes sense to clean up our Trac. The intent is to make our trac better searchable and reduce clutter.
First, I went through the Patches Welcome milestone and marked tickets that in my opinion should be just closed: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/report/35
These are tickets that either talk about enhancements to the local provider, do not have any useful information (example: a crash in the version we shipped in RHEL-6.1) or were simply filed as an idea many years ago but since then nobody stepped up to work on this ticket and nebody requested this work again, so the assumption is that nobody really needs that work.
Feel free to go through this list and push back if you disagree. For tickets where nobody complains about closing them, I will close them in a week from now. If somebody will disagree about closing these tickets, we can always reopen them..
One last call for anyone who would like to push back on some tickets before I close them tomorrow and start cleaning up the 'future releases' milestone.
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Jakub Hrozek -
Justin Stephenson