Hi,
the attached patch was tested by a customer running RHEL6. I'm not sure if we should do any more checking when running on a modern system where ranges can be better defined on the IPA side for example?
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 13:28 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch was tested by a customer running RHEL6. I'm not sure if we should do any more checking when running on a modern system where ranges can be better defined on the IPA side for example?
Ack
Simo.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:00:56AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 13:28 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch was tested by a customer running RHEL6. I'm not sure if we should do any more checking when running on a modern system where ranges can be better defined on the IPA side for example?
Ack
Simo.
Pushed to master and sssd-1-11
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 04:17:27PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:00:56AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-10-23 at 13:28 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch was tested by a customer running RHEL6. I'm not sure if we should do any more checking when running on a modern system where ranges can be better defined on the IPA side for example?
Ack
Simo.
Pushed to master and sssd-1-11
I resolved a very trivial conflict and pushed the attached patch to sssd-1-9 as well.
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org