I found this issue when testing Simo's patches.
The DP was sending the reply in a format the responder did not expect, so the responder always failed to parse the message.
On 07/31/2012 01:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I found this issue when testing Simo's patches.
The DP was sending the reply in a format the responder did not expect, so the responder always failed to parse the message.
Nack.
You should talloc_free(req) even when you are unable to send dbus message, because it is the end of the request anyway.
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:00:58AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 07/31/2012 01:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I found this issue when testing Simo's patches.
The DP was sending the reply in a format the responder did not expect, so the responder always failed to parse the message.
Nack.
You should talloc_free(req) even when you are unable to send dbus message, because it is the end of the request anyway.
Thanks, new patch is attached.
On 08/07/2012 09:13 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:00:58AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 07/31/2012 01:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I found this issue when testing Simo's patches.
The DP was sending the reply in a format the responder did not expect, so the responder always failed to parse the message.
Nack.
You should talloc_free(req) even when you are unable to send dbus message, because it is the end of the request anyway.
Thanks, new patch is attached.
Ack.
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 09:53:05AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 08/07/2012 09:13 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:00:58AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 07/31/2012 01:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I found this issue when testing Simo's patches.
The DP was sending the reply in a format the responder did not expect, so the responder always failed to parse the message.
Nack.
You should talloc_free(req) even when you are unable to send dbus message, because it is the end of the request anyway.
Thanks, new patch is attached.
Ack.
Pushed to master.
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org