[PATCH] Manpage fix

[Jakub Hrozek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marko noticed an inconsistency between what sssd.conf manpage says
(bigger than) and what the code enforces (>=).
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkuE8IwACgkQHsardTLnvCWnSgCgpdoj8R55C7R4I+Vm2xDMhvqs
> BFQAoJH1zCgOK6rD+w+jYRj79o3FF0Ix
> =/3TI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Jakub Hrozek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/24/2010 10:25 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Marko noticed an inconsistency between what sssd.conf manpage says
> (bigger than) and what the code enforces (>=).

Sumit noticed off-list that the patch was incomplete. Hopefully all our
checks, comments and docs are in sync now..
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkuFEt4ACgkQHsardTLnvCVFXwCgwlC8nMZeG/qjm6wwztqA7trh
> Zh0AnAgfg8fqLdwtBXsaAqpibYcwW2pg
> =EK2I
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/24/2010 06:51 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 10:25 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Marko noticed an inconsistency between what sssd.conf manpage says
> > (bigger than) and what the code enforces (>=).
>
> Sumit noticed off-list that the patch was incomplete. Hopefully all our
> checks, comments and docs are in sync now..

Grammar police! :-P

Manpage should read "The value of this parameter must be greater than or
equal to offline_credentials_expiration."

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkuGeikACgkQeiVVYja6o6M9zACeNwd24DGEbTq/7/HnCqtvne5O
> mLgAniqMWk+DgRGQZli9Bt69BP5MgTAc
> =zDH6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Jakub Hrozek]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/25/2010 02:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Grammar police! :-P
>
> Manpage should read "The value of this parameter must be greater than or
> equal to offline_credentials_expiration."

Thanks, new patch attached.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkuGfKUACgkQHsardTLnvCVeDACfTk9au2qMLuISaU81nZTSzfOd
> wUkAoLVlWViPiJYignOfq02Ip/n7Hv+T
> =mdj5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/25/2010 08:35 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 02/25/2010 02:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Grammar police! :-P
> > Manpage should read "The value of this parameter must be greater than or
> > equal to offline_credentials_expiration."
>
> Thanks, new patch attached.

Ack and pushed to master.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkuGfdcACgkQeiVVYja6o6MKQwCgiW9bNlotIwL+6jmdgWleYKYk
> dvcAn3zJqKcfqlrVM/fmm4zhwtgEnYmJ
> =jMWJ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[David O'Brien]

Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/25/2010 02:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Grammar police! :-P
> >
> > Manpage should read "The value of this parameter must be greater than or
> > equal to offline_credentials_expiration."
>
> Thanks, new patch attached.

I don't feel like such a nit-picker now  ;-)