[PATCH] extended the documentation of LDAP backend

[Sumit Bose]

Hi,

this patch extends the man page of the LDAP backend and added a
configuration example for AD.

bye,
Sumit

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/20/2009 09:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>  Hi,
>  
>  this patch extends the man page of the LDAP backend and added a
>  configuration example for AD.
>  
>  bye,
>  Sumit
>  
>  
>  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  sssd-devel mailing list
>  sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel 
Ack.  One minor typo that I will fix when I push:

+                            The LDAP attribute that list the user's
+                            groupmenberships.

Should be 'group memberships'

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkqOzosACgkQeiVVYja6o6PGswCfeEmHoeVowRakwWAUgtXOo27e
> tY8An3PtLh5vO8rQQL9tm8oUroAGlkGG
> =jV/6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/21/2009 12:42 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>  On 08/20/2009 09:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
>  
> > this patch extends the man page of the LDAP backend and added a
> > configuration example for AD.
>  
> > bye,
> > Sumit
>  
>  
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
> > _______________________________________________
> > sssd-devel mailing list
> > sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
>  
>  Ack.  One minor typo that I will fix when I push:
>  
>  +                            The LDAP attribute that list the user's
>  +                            groupmenberships.
>  
>  Should be 'group memberships'
>   
Pushed to master.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkqO0g8ACgkQeiVVYja6o6N95gCfSinyuSdHZc1/oGijLgsXssdN
> 7rEAn05qvs2ZkclcDj3X89BwBY1hOrRo
> =h3ls
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Simo Sorce]

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:42 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>  +; userName = msSFU30Name 
Just noticed you are using the old MS SFU schema extensions as examples.
These extensions are obsoleteed since Windows 2003 R2 came out, and I
really don't think we should advertise them as a good default
configuration.

Windows 2003 R2 includes rfc2307 extensions, please use the attributes
names specified there.

HP has a nice doc about the mappings:
http://docs.hp.com/en/J4269-90062/ar01s03.html?btnNext=next%A0%BB


Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

[Sumit Bose]

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 05:48:01PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>  On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:42 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>  > +; userName = msSFU30Name
>  
>  Just noticed you are using the old MS SFU schema extensions as examples.
>  These extensions are obsoleteed since Windows 2003 R2 came out, and I
>  really don't think we should advertise them as a good default
>  configuration.
>  
>  Windows 2003 R2 includes rfc2307 extensions, please use the attributes
>  names specified there.
>  
>  HP has a nice doc about the mappings:
>  http://docs.hp.com/en/J4269-90062/ar01s03.html?btnNext=next%A0%BB
>  
>   
good point. I will make some test and update the example.

Btw. I was thinking about introducing some meta-providers like files,
where a number of sensible options is set in one run. For example
'provider=ADS' or 'provider=ADS_SFU' which will set the RFC2307 or SFU
mappings respectively and other useful options. Another candidate would
be 'provider=IPA'. With the DNS helper our config files would look quite
simple:

[domains/MYIPA.COM]
    provider = IPA

[domains/MYADS.COM]
    provider = ADS

What do you think about this?

bye,
Sumit

[Simo Sorce]

On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 11:28 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
>  good point. I will make some test and update the example.
>  
>  Btw. I was thinking about introducing some meta-providers like files,
>  where a number of sensible options is set in one run. For example
>  'provider=ADS' or 'provider=ADS_SFU' which will set the RFC2307 or SFU
>  mappings respectively and other useful options. Another candidate
>  would
>  be 'provider=IPA'. With the DNS helper our config files would look
>  quite
>  simple:
>  
>  [domains/MYIPA.COM]
>      provider = IPA
>  
>  [domains/MYADS.COM]
>      provider = ADS
>  
>  What do you think about this? 
It's an interesting idea, and would allow us to keep as much code as
possible in common.

Unless we find that the code becomes too full of switches I'd agree to
go this way.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York