[PATCH] Add support for the EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout

[Stephen Gallagher]

This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.

Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.

[Sumit Bose]

On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
>
> Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.

NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
refactoring, please do this before adding more code.

More comments follow below.

bye,
Sumit
> From c8d774ee2741c76c4c2a07bcae112924b0061e86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stephen Gallagher 
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:59:53 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Add support for the EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout
>
> This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
>
> server/examples/sssd.conf         |   13 ++
>  server/man/sssd.conf.5.xml        |   13 ++
>  server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c     |   20 ++++
>  server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h     |    7 +-
>  server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c |  227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  5 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c
> index 456c629..6d7bf74 100644
> --- a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c
> +++ b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,26 @@ static int nss_get_config(struct nss_ctx *nctx,
>                           &nctx->neg_timeout);
>      if (ret != EOK) goto done;
> ret = confdb_get_int(cdb, nctx, NSS_SRV_CONFIG,
>                     "EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout", 0,
>                     &nctx->enum_cache_refresh_timeout);
> if (ret != EOK) goto done;
> if (nctx->enum_cache_refresh_timeout >= nctx->enum_cache_timeout) {
>    DEBUG(0,("Configuration error: EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout exceeds"
>             "EnumCacheTimeout. Disabling feature.\n"));
>    nctx->enum_cache_refresh_timeout = 0;
> }
> ret = confdb_get_int(cdb, nctx, NSS_SRV_CONFIG,
>                     "EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout", 0,
>                     &nctx->cache_refresh_timeout);
> if (ret != EOK) goto done;
> if (nctx->cache_refresh_timeout >= nctx->cache_timeout) {
>    DEBUG(0,("Configuration error: EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout exceeds"
>             "EntryCacheTimeout. Disabling feature.\n"));
>    nctx->cache_refresh_timeout = 0;
> }
> ret = confdb_get_string_as_list(cdb, tmpctx, NSS_SRV_CONFIG,
>                                    "filterUsers", &filter_list);
>    if (ret == ENOENT) filter_list = NULL;

I haven't check other timeouts so far, but I think it makes sense to
check if *_timeout < 0.
> diff --git a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h
> index 0d3124c..e756384 100644
> --- a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h
> +++ b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h
> @@ -50,11 +50,14 @@ struct getent_ctx;
>  struct nss_ctx {
>      struct resp_ctx *rctx;
> int cache_timeout;
> int neg_timeout;
> struct nss_nc_ctx *ncache;
> int neg_timeout;
> int cache_timeout;
> int enum_cache_timeout;
> int cache_refresh_timeout;
> int enum_cache_refresh_timeout;
> time_t last_user_enum;
>    time_t last_group_enum;

The *_timeout variables are use to compare against unsigned values. I
would prefer the *_timeout having a type of time_t or uint*.
> diff --git a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c
> index e8f178a..f00a423 100644
> --- a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c
> +++ b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c
> @@ -273,12 +273,15 @@ static void nss_cmd_getpwnam_callback(void *ptr, int status,
>      struct cli_ctx *cctx = cmdctx->cctx;
>      struct sss_domain_info *dom;
>      struct nss_ctx *nctx;
> int timeout;
> int timeout, refresh_timeout;

see above and http://freeipa.org/page/Coding_Style#Declaring .
> time_t now;
> uint64_t lastUpdate;
> uint8_t *body;
> size_t blen;
> bool call_provider = false;
> bool neghit = false;
> bool need_callback = true;
> sss_dp_callback_t cb = NULL;
> int ncret;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -296,16 +299,33 @@ static void nss_cmd_getpwnam_callback(void *ptr, int status,
>      if (dctx->check_provider) {
>          switch (res->count) {
>          case 0:
>        /* This is a cache miss. We need to get the updated user information
>         * before returning it.
>         */
>        call_provider = true;
>        need_callback = true;
>        break;
>
>    case 1:
>        timeout = nctx->cache_timeout;
>        refresh_timeout = nctx->cache_refresh_timeout;
>        lastUpdate = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_uint64(res->msgs[0],
>                                                 SYSDB_LAST_UPDATE, 0);
>        if (lastUpdate + timeout < time(NULL)) {
>        now = time(NULL);
>        if (lastUpdate + timeout < now) {
>            /* This is a cache miss. We need to get the updated user
>             * information before returning it.
>             */
>            call_provider = true;
>            need_callback = true;
>        }
>        else if (refresh_timeout && (lastUpdate + refresh_timeout < now)) {
>            /* We're past the the cache refresh timeout
>             * We'll return the value from the cache, but we'll also
>             * queue the cache entry for update out-of-band.
>             */
>            call_provider = true;
>            need_callback = false;
>        }

I would prefer an else-block here. Although call_provider and
need_callback are initialised to do the right thing an else-block would
make it easier to follow the logic here.
>          break;

[Stephen Gallagher]

I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.

I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
the cache is still valid.

Addressing other points from the review inline below.

On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> >
> > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
>
> NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> refactoring, please do this before adding more code.

Done.
> More comments follow below.
>
> bye,
> Sumit
> > From c8d774ee2741c76c4c2a07bcae112924b0061e86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Stephen Gallagher 
> > Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:59:53 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add support for the EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout
> >
> > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> >
> > server/examples/sssd.conf         |   13 ++
> >  server/man/sssd.conf.5.xml        |   13 ++
> >  server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c     |   20 ++++
> >  server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h     |    7 +-
> >  server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c |  227 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  5 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c
> > index 456c629..6d7bf74 100644
> > --- a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c
> > +++ b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.c
> > @@ -103,6 +103,26 @@ static int nss_get_config(struct nss_ctx *nctx,
> >                           &nctx->neg_timeout);
> >      if (ret != EOK) goto done;
> > ret = confdb_get_int(cdb, nctx, NSS_SRV_CONFIG,
> >                     "EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout", 0,
> >                     &nctx->enum_cache_refresh_timeout);
> > if (ret != EOK) goto done;
> > if (nctx->enum_cache_refresh_timeout >= nctx->enum_cache_timeout) {
> >    DEBUG(0,("Configuration error: EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout exceeds"
> >             "EnumCacheTimeout. Disabling feature.\n"));
> >    nctx->enum_cache_refresh_timeout = 0;
> > }
> > ret = confdb_get_int(cdb, nctx, NSS_SRV_CONFIG,
> >                     "EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout", 0,
> >                     &nctx->cache_refresh_timeout);
> > if (ret != EOK) goto done;
> > if (nctx->cache_refresh_timeout >= nctx->cache_timeout) {
> >    DEBUG(0,("Configuration error: EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout exceeds"
> >             "EntryCacheTimeout. Disabling feature.\n"));
> >    nctx->cache_refresh_timeout = 0;
> > }
> > ret = confdb_get_string_as_list(cdb, tmpctx, NSS_SRV_CONFIG,
> >                                    "filterUsers", &filter_list);
> >    if (ret == ENOENT) filter_list = NULL;
>
> I haven't check other timeouts so far, but I think it makes sense to
> check if *_timeout < 0.

Added a check for the cache_refresh_timeout < 0
> > diff --git a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h
> > index 0d3124c..e756384 100644
> > --- a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h
> > +++ b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv.h
> > @@ -50,11 +50,14 @@ struct getent_ctx;
> >  struct nss_ctx {
> >      struct resp_ctx *rctx;
> > int cache_timeout;
> > int neg_timeout;
> > struct nss_nc_ctx *ncache;
> > int neg_timeout;
> > int cache_timeout;
> > int enum_cache_timeout;
> > int cache_refresh_timeout;
> > int enum_cache_refresh_timeout;
> > time_t last_user_enum;
> >    time_t last_group_enum;
>
> The *_timeout variables are use to compare against unsigned values. I
> would prefer the *_timeout having a type of time_t or uint*.

Unfortunately, our confdb utilities only allow me to read out an int.
There's no benefit to casting them to unsigned in any case, since no
sensible admin is ever going to have a cache timeout greater than 2^16
seconds, and we're checking to make sure it's greater than zero.
> > diff --git a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c
> > index e8f178a..f00a423 100644
> > --- a/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c
> > +++ b/server/responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c
> > @@ -273,12 +273,15 @@ static void nss_cmd_getpwnam_callback(void *ptr, int status,
> >      struct cli_ctx *cctx = cmdctx->cctx;
> >      struct sss_domain_info *dom;
> >      struct nss_ctx *nctx;
> > int timeout;
> > int timeout, refresh_timeout;
>
> see above and http://freeipa.org/page/Coding_Style#Declaring .

Fixed.
> > time_t now;
> > uint64_t lastUpdate;
> > uint8_t *body;
> > size_t blen;
> > bool call_provider = false;
> > bool neghit = false;
> > bool need_callback = true;
> > sss_dp_callback_t cb = NULL;
> > int ncret;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -296,16 +299,33 @@ static void nss_cmd_getpwnam_callback(void *ptr, int status,
> >      if (dctx->check_provider) {
> >          switch (res->count) {
> >          case 0:
> >        /* This is a cache miss. We need to get the updated user information
> >         * before returning it.
> >         */
> >        call_provider = true;
> >        need_callback = true;
> >        break;
> >
> >    case 1:
> >        timeout = nctx->cache_timeout;
> >        refresh_timeout = nctx->cache_refresh_timeout;
> >        lastUpdate = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_uint64(res->msgs[0],
> >                                                 SYSDB_LAST_UPDATE, 0);
> >        if (lastUpdate + timeout < time(NULL)) {
> >        now = time(NULL);
> >        if (lastUpdate + timeout < now) {
> >            /* This is a cache miss. We need to get the updated user
> >             * information before returning it.
> >             */
> >            call_provider = true;
> >            need_callback = true;
> >        }
> >        else if (refresh_timeout && (lastUpdate + refresh_timeout < now)) {
> >            /* We're past the the cache refresh timeout
> >             * We'll return the value from the cache, but we'll also
> >             * queue the cache entry for update out-of-band.
> >             */
> >            call_provider = true;
> >            need_callback = false;
> >        }
>
> I would prefer an else-block here. Although call_provider and
> need_callback are initialised to do the right thing an else-block would
> make it easier to follow the logic here.

Added.
> >          break;
>
> sssd-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

[Sumit Bose]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:32:55PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
> EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.
>
> I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
> point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
> the cache is still valid.
>
> Addressing other points from the review inline below.
>
> On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> > >
> > > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
> >
> > NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> > refactoring, please do this before adding more code.
>
> Done.

Works for me, but can you add a man page entry for
EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout ?

bye,
Sumit

[Stephen Gallagher]

On 09/09/2009 07:50 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:32:55PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
> > EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.
> >
> > I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
> > point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
> > the cache is still valid.
> >
> > Addressing other points from the review inline below.
> >
> > On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > > > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > > > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > > > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > > > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> > > >
> > > > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > > > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
> > >
> > > NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> > > refactoring, please do this before adding more code.
> >
> > Done.
>
> Works for me, but can you add a man page entry for
> EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout ?
>
> bye,
> Sumit
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Whoops, forgot to add those to the commit. New patch 0002 attached
(patch 0001 unaffected)

[Sumit Bose]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:25:19AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/09/2009 07:50 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:32:55PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
> > > EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.
> > >
> > > I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
> > > point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
> > > the cache is still valid.
> > >
> > > Addressing other points from the review inline below.
> > >
> > > On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > > > > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > > > > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > > > > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > > > > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> > > > >
> > > > > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > > > > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
> > > >
> > > > NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> > > > refactoring, please do this before adding more code.
> > >
> > > Done.
> >
> > Works for me, but can you add a man page entry for
> > EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout ?
> >
> > bye,
> > Sumit
> > _______________________________________________
> > sssd-devel mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
>
> Whoops, forgot to add those to the commit. New patch 0002 attached
> (patch 0001 unaffected)

Thanks.

ACK

bye,
Sumit

[Sumit Bose]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:32:55PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
> EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.
>
> I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
> point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
> the cache is still valid.
>
> Addressing other points from the review inline below.
>
> On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> > >
> > > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
> >
> > NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> > refactoring, please do this before adding more code.
>
> Done.

hmm, I must force myself not to use debugging option while testing
patches ...

I have seen this one:
....
responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c: In function 'nss_cmd_getgrnam_callback':
responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c:1728: warning: unused variable 'cache_ctx'
....

bye,
Sumit

[Stephen Gallagher]

On 09/09/2009 08:46 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:32:55PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
> > EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.
> >
> > I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
> > point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
> > the cache is still valid.
> >
> > Addressing other points from the review inline below.
> >
> > On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > > > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > > > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > > > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > > > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> > > >
> > > > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > > > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
> > >
> > > NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> > > refactoring, please do this before adding more code.
> >
> > Done.
>
> hmm, I must force myself not to use debugging option while testing
> patches ...
>
> I have seen this one:
> ....
> responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c: In function 'nss_cmd_getgrnam_callback':
> responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c:1728: warning: unused variable 'cache_ctx'
> ....
>
> bye,
> Sumit
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Thought I had removed all of those. That was in there for when I
originally thought I would need to return something from check_cache to
the caller.

New patches attached.

[Sumit Bose]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 09/09/2009 08:46 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:32:55PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
> > > EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.
> > >
> > > I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
> > > point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
> > > the cache is still valid.
> > >
> > > Addressing other points from the review inline below.
> > >
> > > On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > > > > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > > > > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > > > > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > > > > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> > > > >
> > > > > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > > > > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
> > > >
> > > > NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> > > > refactoring, please do this before adding more code.
> > >
> > > Done.
> >
> > hmm, I must force myself not to use debugging option while testing
> > patches ...
> >
> > I have seen this one:
> > ....
> > responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c: In function 'nss_cmd_getgrnam_callback':
> > responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c:1728: warning: unused variable 'cache_ctx'
> > ....
> >
> > bye,
> > Sumit
> > _______________________________________________
> > sssd-devel mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
>
> Thought I had removed all of those. That was in there for when I
> originally thought I would need to return something from check_cache to
> the caller.
>
> New patches attached.

ACK

bye,
Sumit

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/09/2009 09:27 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 09/09/2009 08:46 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 08:32:55PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > I have refactored nsssrv_cmd.c and created a new patch for the
> > > > EntryCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout.
> > > >
> > > > I have created a new function, check_cache() which is a common entry
> > > > point for getpwnam, getpwuid, getgrnam and getgrgid to examine whether
> > > > the cache is still valid.
> > > >
> > > > Addressing other points from the review inline below.
> > > >
> > > > On 08/17/2009 11:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 03:46:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > > > This timeout specifies the lifetime of a cache entry before it is
> > > > > > updated out-of-band. When this timeout is hit, the request will
> > > > > > still complete from cache, but the SSSD will also go and update
> > > > > > the cached entry in the background to extend the life of the
> > > > > > cache entry and reduce the wait time of a future request.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Support for the EnumCacheNoWaitRefreshTimeout is still forthcoming, but
> > > > > > I wanted to get a formal review on this portion.
> > > > >
> > > > > NACK. I think this patch indicates that nsssrv_cmd.c needs some
> > > > > refactoring, please do this before adding more code.
> > > >
> > > > Done.
> > >
> > > hmm, I must force myself not to use debugging option while testing
> > > patches ...
> > >
> > > I have seen this one:
> > > ....
> > > responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c: In function 'nss_cmd_getgrnam_callback':
> > > responder/nss/nsssrv_cmd.c:1728: warning: unused variable 'cache_ctx'
> > > ....
> > >
> > > bye,
> > > Sumit
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > sssd-devel mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
> >
> > Thought I had removed all of those. That was in there for when I
> > originally thought I would need to return something from check_cache to
> > the caller.
> >
> > New patches attached.
>
> ACK
>
> bye,
> Sumit
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel

Pushed to master.

- -- 
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkqnvYQACgkQeiVVYja6o6PIhQCgsVE5q69/ksiqtoLsVAj/O61u
> 84wAmwZTizHYKVJF4Zw6IB/UpevnnDwT
> =opE9
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----