Ah yes - I can't believe I didn't do that first before messing with debugging and posting to the list. Absolutely fixed my issue.
I wasn't fully clear on the note about removing support of handling local users so I dug up commit 3e94b64 and have it on my list of things to read through.
```
"Files provider" (i.e. id_provider = files) is deprecated and might be removed in further releases. Those who are interested to keep using it awhile should configure its build explicitly using --with-files-provider ./configure option. Or consider using "Proxy provider" with proxy_lib_name = files instead.
```
And then
Like so many important things, Ubuntu lags pretty hard on SSSD in comparison to RHEL, but I have to assume we'll see the removal down the line sooner or later.
Thanks again for all the help, I'm down to one final SSSD related problem to investigate. If I relent I'll probably post a question about socket activated vs service based responders for pac and nss.
IIRC, there was an issue that PAC responder is enabled implicitly for IPA/AD domains, and Debian/Ubuntu also had socket activation enabled by default.
(see 'man sssd.conf::implicit_pac_responder')
--
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-users-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue