On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 06:55:20PM -0800, Daniel Jung wrote:
you are correct. it is in for 6.6.
The fact that RHEL rebased was a contributing factor in us marking the
1.9 branch as EOL.
As a side note -- release numbers in RHEL often bear little resemblance
to what the code really is. You need to also take into account all the
patches applied on top of the tarball. At the end of 6.5 lifetime the
release number of SSSD was -129.6 and there were 294 patches applied on
top of the patch.
This has to do more with how RHEL is released from the procedural side
rather than technical -- at one point, the tarballs are 'frozen' and
only patches can be applied so the changes in code can be controlled
On Dec 9, 2014 6:29 PM, "Dmitri Pal"
> On 12/09/2014 08:21 PM, Daniel Jung wrote:
> Sorry my bad, I meant to ask if there will be backport/version update to
> 1.9.7 from 1.9.2 in redhat. -
> You mean into RHEL 6.x?
> AFAIK there is already 1.11 in 6.6
> Am I wrong?
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Lukas Slebodnik <lslebodn(a)redhat.com>
>> On (09/12/14 14:53), Daniel Jung wrote:
>> >Just curious, when 1.9.7 and 1.11. branch will make its way into the
>> What do you mean by upstream?
>> sssd - 1.9.7 is tagged in git
>> sh$ git tag | grep sssd-1_9_7
>> And tarball is on upstream page https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/
>> sssd-users mailing list
> sssd-users mailing
> Thank you,
> Dmitri Pal
> Sr. Engineering Manager IdM portfolio
> Red Hat, Inc.
> sssd-users mailing list
sssd-users mailing list