Recommended ldb version

[Joakim Tjernlund]

Which version(s) of ldb (http://ldb.samba.org) works well
for sssd?

I noticed I have 1.1.29 here which feels a bit old.

Jocke

[Galen Johnson]

The version may depend on your OS.  For example, on RHEL/CentOS 7.5, it has
1.2.2.  Is there any reason to believe that the version of ldb on your
system is incompatible with your version of sssd?

=G=

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:36 AM Joakim Tjernlund <
[e-mail]> wrote:
> Which version(s) of ldb (http://ldb.samba.org) works well
> for sssd?
>
> I noticed I have 1.1.29 here which feels a bit old.
>
> Jocke
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Joakim Tjernlund]

I use Gentoo and there I have a choice, up to 1.3.3. I want to use whatever everyone else uses to avoid problems.
1.2.2 should be fine then from what you just told me.
What about 1.3.x ? Latest samba uses this so soon I guess we have to pull it in.

Jocke
On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 09:02 -0400, Galen Johnson wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

The version may depend on your OS.  For example, on RHEL/CentOS 7.5, it has 1.2.2.  Is there any reason to believe that the version of ldb on your system is incompatible with your version of sssd?

=G=

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:36 AM Joakim Tjernlund <[e-mail]> wrote:
Which version(s) of ldb (http://ldb.samba.org) works well
for sssd?

I noticed I have 1.1.29 here which feels a bit old.

Jocke
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

_______________________________________________

sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]

To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Galen Johnson]

Unfortunately, that's not how the other distro's do things.  You might want
to look at what Fedora includes since that would be close to the bleeding
edge and, IIRC, SSSD is typically more current there.  Gentoo has the
"advantage" of compiling everything from scratch.  As for compatibility
issues, I will defer to the development team regarding dependency
versions.  I have a coworker who uses Gentoo.  I've asked him what he used
and I'll follow up if he responds.,

=G=

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:57 AM Joakim Tjernlund <
[e-mail]> wrote:
> I use Gentoo and there I have a choice, up to 1.3.3. I want to use
> whatever everyone else uses to avoid problems.
> 1.2.2 should be fine then from what you just told me.
> What about 1.3.x ? Latest samba uses this so soon I guess we have to pull
> it in.
>
> Jocke
> On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 09:02 -0400, Galen Johnson wrote:
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
> The version may depend on your OS.  For example, on RHEL/CentOS 7.5, it
> has 1.2.2.  Is there any reason to believe that the version of ldb on your
> system is incompatible with your version of sssd?
>
> =G=
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:36 AM Joakim Tjernlund <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Which version(s) of ldb (http://ldb.samba.org) works well
> for sssd?
>
> I noticed I have 1.1.29 here which feels a bit old.
>
> Jocke
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
> sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
>
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
>
> sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Galen Johnson]

Just to circle back to this.  He is seeing the same versions.  I expect
this is something to take up with the Gentoo maintainers...or see if there
is a different overlay that is more current.

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 11:08 AM Galen Johnson  wrote:
> Unfortunately, that's not how the other distro's do things.  You might
> want to look at what Fedora includes since that would be close to the
> bleeding edge and, IIRC, SSSD is typically more current there.  Gentoo has
> the "advantage" of compiling everything from scratch.  As for compatibility
> issues, I will defer to the development team regarding dependency
> versions.  I have a coworker who uses Gentoo.  I've asked him what he used
> and I'll follow up if he responds.,
>
> =G=
>
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 9:57 AM Joakim Tjernlund <
> [e-mail]> wrote:
> > I use Gentoo and there I have a choice, up to 1.3.3. I want to use
> > whatever everyone else uses to avoid problems.
> > 1.2.2 should be fine then from what you just told me.
> > What about 1.3.x ? Latest samba uses this so soon I guess we have to pull
> > it in.
> >
> > Jocke
> > On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 09:02 -0400, Galen Johnson wrote:
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
> > the content is safe.
> >
> > The version may depend on your OS.  For example, on RHEL/CentOS 7.5, it
> > has 1.2.2.  Is there any reason to believe that the version of ldb on your
> > system is incompatible with your version of sssd?
> >
> > =G=
> >
> > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 8:36 AM Joakim Tjernlund <
> > [e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > Which version(s) of ldb (http://ldb.samba.org) works well
> > for sssd?
> >
> > I noticed I have 1.1.29 here which feels a bit old.
> >
> > Jocke
> > _______________________________________________
> > sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> >
> > sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> >
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> >
> > sssd-users mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]

[Lukas Slebodnik]

On (17/05/18 09:30), Galen Johnson wrote:
> Just to circle back to this.  He is seeing the same versions.  I expect
> this is something to take up with the Gentoo maintainers...or see if there
> is a different overlay that is more current.

FYI: sssd does not require any new symbols/functions in ldb.
And the oldest version should be LDB_0.9.10

On the other hand, there was an ABI changes between versions
(1.1.30..1.2.0)

Therefore it might be better to choose ldb >= 1.2.0
because other packages(samba) might require newer version then
1.1.29-r1 or 1.1.26

LS