On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 04:45:43PM +0200, Milan Kerslager wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 05:10:45AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 10:01:20AM +0100, Mike Martin wrote:
> > previously, when RH has included a new compiler, compat packages have
> > been included for previous version
> But gcc 3.2.x is compatible with gcc 3.3.x (there are some corner cases
> but I believe gcc 3.2.x would simply ICE on them rather than generating
> ABI incompatible code with gcc 3.3.x).
So there is the last question: Do we need compat-libstdc++ from RH 9?
Depends if you need that compatibility or not.
compat-libstdc++ in Cambridge provides 2.96-RH, egcs 1.1.2 and some earlier
libstdc++'s. If you have something still compiled against them, you need
them, otherwise you don't.