2011-02-11 @ 17:00 UTC - F15 Alpha Blocker bug review meeting

[James Laska]

# F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-02-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1]
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net

Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora
15.  We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the
Alpha release criteria [2], should stay on the list, and are getting the
attention they  need.

== Suggested Meeting Preparation ==

If you are the OWNER of one of these bugs, PLEASE add a comment to the
bug letting us know how things are going and what you are planning to do
next.

If your bug is in MODIFIED, please make sure a build has been submitted.
If that's already happened, please change the bug to ON_QA so we can
start test verification.  Note, that once the release is branched [3],
bodhi updates will also be required.

If you REPORTED a bug, please be responsive to any requests for
additional information.

== Proposed F15Alpha Blocker bugs ==

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F15Alpha&hide_reso...

674978 :: NEW :: gdm :: [e-mail] :: GDM in autologon error
loop :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674978

675509 :: NEW :: libXcursor :: [e-mail] :: default cursor
theme should not depend on used desktop environment ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675509

672265 :: NEW :: LiveCD :: [e-mail] :: "Install to harddrive"
fails with "not a live image" ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672265

671922 :: ASSIGNED :: anaconda :: [e-mail] :: ValueError:
isys.umount() can only umount by mount point ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671922

670379 :: ASSIGNED :: firstboot :: [e-mail] :: Unknown lvalue
'ValidNoProcess' in section 'Service'. ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670379

579838 :: ASSIGNED :: binutils :: [e-mail] :: glibc not
compatible with AMD Geode LX ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838

676032 :: MODIFIED :: anaconda :: [e-mail] ::
Import Error: No module named iutil ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676032

673907 :: MODIFIED :: lorax :: [e-mail] :: Install from DVD
fails: /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket is missing ::
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673907

== Proposed F15Alpha Nice-to-have bugs ==

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F15Alpha-accepted&...

669037 :: NEW :: gnome-settings-daemon :: [e-mail] :: [abrt]
gnome-settings-daemon-2.91.8-1.fc15:
Process /usr/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon was killed by signal 11
(SIGSEGV) :: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669037

Thanks,
James

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Alpha_Release_Criteria
[3]
http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-15/f-15-quality-tasks.html

2011-02-11 - F15 Alpha Blocker bug review recap

[James Laska]

=================================================
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Alpha Blocker Bug Review
=================================================

Meeting started by jlaska at 17:00:20 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-02-11/f15alpha-bug-r...
.

Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll call  (jlaska, 17:00:43)

* Introduction  (jlaska, 17:03:57)
  * our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed _Alpha_ blocker
    bugs and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to
    monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and
    nice-to-have bugs  (jlaska, 17:04:54)
  * LINK: http://bit.ly/eBLZKl   (jlaska, 17:10:01)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676519  (jlaska, 17:10:26)
  * HELP: Should RAID-10 install scenarios qualify under the Beta
    release criteria?  (jlaska, 17:13:29)
  * AGREED: 676519 - does not impact Alpha release criteria - move to
    F15Beta and review RAID criteria for Beta  (jlaska, 17:16:53)
  * need to assess whether RAID-10 meets Beta release criteria  (jlaska,
    17:17:38)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676551  (jlaska, 17:17:48)
  * AGREED: 676551 - Does not impact Alpha criteria, move to F15Blocker
    to track netinst.iso mediacheck prompt, ensure release notes are
    planned for updates about initrd.img changes.  (jlaska, 17:23:54)
  * set '?' release_notes flag to ensure someone from the docs team can
    assist with documenting the initrd changes  (jlaska, 17:24:31)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676032  (jlaska, 17:25:38)
  * Fixed, and awaiting testing against TC#2  (jlaska, 17:28:51)
  * AGREED: 676032 - accepted as a F15Alpha blocker, will be available
    in anaconda-15.20 (TC#2)  (jlaska, 17:29:33)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671922  (jlaska, 17:29:54)
  * Fixed in anaconda-15.20 and will be available in TC#2  (jlaska,
    17:30:26)
  * AGREED: 671922 - Likely impacts Beta release criteria.  Already
    fixed in anaconda-15.20, available in TC#2 for testing.  (jlaska,
    17:34:57)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838  (jlaska, 17:35:21)
  * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F12X86Support
    (jlaska, 17:43:03)
  * AGREED: 579838 - accepted as Alpha blocker as this impacts all XO's
    and is already fixed  (jlaska, 17:43:08)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676485  (jlaska, 17:43:33)
  * Recommend to resolve the dependency problem, or remove 'gnome-pilot'
    from comps for F15Alpha  (jlaska, 17:51:33)
  * AGREED: 676485 - accepted as F15Alpha blocker.  Work with desktop
    SIG to identify how to proceed for Alpha  (jlaska, 17:51:36)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670379  (jlaska, 17:51:37)
  * AGREED: 670379 - accepted as F15Alpha release blocker as this
    impacts ability login as non-root user and also hits Alpha desktop
    criteria  (jlaska, 17:57:15)
  * ACTION: mgracik - start off the week battling firstboot + systemd
    integration  (jlaska, 17:57:28)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674978  (jlaska, 17:58:26)
  * AGREED: 674978 - accepted as a F14Alpha blocker, impacts logging
    into desktop on all live images  (jlaska, 18:01:58)
  * halfline under the weather, check-in with him early next week for
    guidance on resolving 674978  (jlaska, 18:06:28)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673921  (jlaska, 18:06:36)
  * AGREED: 673921 - not accepted as a F15Alpha blocker.  Reasonable
    workaround of typing in username exists  (jlaska, 18:14:37)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675509  (jlaska, 18:16:20)
  * AGREED: 675509 - Rejected as F15Alpha blocker, appears more of a
    polish issue, than a core functionality problem.  Accepted as
    F15Beta-accepted (Nice to have)  (jlaska, 18:21:48)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672265  (jlaska, 18:22:21)
  * AGREED: 672265 - Accepted as F15Alpha blocker, impacts *all* live
    image installs.  (jlaska, 18:27:11)
  * ACTION: brunowolff cloning a new bug from 672265 to handle a
    potential second, but related, problem affecting the cow image
    (jlaska, 18:32:16)
  * HELP: 672265 could use some extra eyes to determine what might be
    causing this issue (possibly introduction of xz compression)
    (jlaska, 18:35:04)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673907  (jlaska, 18:38:36)
  * AGREED: 673907 accepted as F15Alpha blocker as this impacts all
    installs  (jlaska, 18:44:23)
  * clumens and dgilmore reviewing whether an additional/different fix
    is required  (jlaska, 18:49:02)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669037  (jlaska, 18:49:53)
  * Nice-To-Have bug process -
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process  (jlaska,
    18:50:34)
  * AGREED: 669037 - Accepted as Alpha NICE-TO-HAVE (F15Alpha-accepted)
    (jlaska, 18:57:03)
  * potentially consider for F15Beta blocker since this *may* impact
    insertion/removal of removable media  (jlaska, 18:57:29)

* Open discussion - <your bug here>  (jlaska, 18:57:39)

Meeting ended at 19:00:47 UTC.

Action Items
------------
* mgracik - start off the week battling firstboot + systemd integration
* brunowolff cloning a new bug from 672265 to handle a potential second,
  but related, problem affecting the cow image

Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* brunowolff
  * brunowolff cloning a new bug from 672265 to handle a potential
    second, but related, problem affecting the cow image
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * mgracik - start off the week battling firstboot + systemd
    integration

People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* jlaska (343)
* dgilmore (80)
* Viking-Ice (67)
* brunowolff (39)
* clumens (29)
* rbergeron (25)
* jsmith (21)
* buggbot (13)
* mclasen (12)
* bcl (11)
* heffer (7)
* tflink_ (5)
* tflink (4)
* zodbot (4)

Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot