test July 2003

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

224 participants
272 discussions

Red Hat Switch Printer?
by Rick Johnson 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

Why would this remain in the beta if LPR is no longer included? I noticed it's not selected by default, but the option to choose it during install still exists. Thx, -Rick -- Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - rjohnson(a)medata.com Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc. PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc

4 3

yum upgrading rhl9->severn
by seth vidal 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

Hey, I've gotten one confirmed report of yum upgrade working fine with a rhl9->severn upgrade. useless trivia - but I've been asked about it already so I figured I'd post. -sv

1 0

apt-get anyone?
by Klaasjan Brand 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

Hi, Anyone busy setting up an apt-gettable version for the new RH beta? Klaasjan

4 3

RHN access to severn isos?
by joe 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

Will RHN members be granted access to priority isos, or shall we be struggling for access to overloaded ftp servers along with the general public? I didn't see any way to access severn isos on my RHN page - Here's hoping, Joe

5 7

Status of RPM?
by Ajay Ramaswamy 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

How is it that rpm has not been listed as a core component along with anaconda? Does this mean that RPM will continue to be developed without coming under the RHL umbrella? regards Ajay

4 3

New Beta - MySQL
by Rick Johnson 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

I'm somewhat disappointed to see that MySQL 4.x didn't make it into this beta. Any particular reason why? -Rick -- Rick Johnson, RHCE #807302311706007 - rjohnson(a)medata.com Linux/Network Administrator - Medata, Inc. PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/rjohnson.asc

5 5

XFS Support?
by Ajay Ramaswamy 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

Since the aim is to make kernel 2.6 run on rhl, can we at least make a start by adding the user space fs tools? regards Ajay

2 1

RE: submitting bugs?
by Pavel Rosenboim 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

> -----Original Message----- > From: M A Young [mailto:m.a.young@durham.ac.uk] > Sent: Mon, July 21, 2003 6:43 PM > To: rhl-beta-list(a)redhat.com > Subject: submitting bugs? > > > Has bugzilla realised there is a new beta yet? I can't see any obvious > category for the new beta, the closest match probably being rawhide. > > While I am writing this perhaps people can comment whether my problem > really is a bug. The issue is that if you had added a java > plugin (in my > case the ns610 one from 1.4.2) to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins so > it worked > under shrike, mozilla won't start after you upgrade it - the fix is to > replace the plugin with the ns610-gcc32 plugin instead. >From release notes: For proper Java operation, the Mozilla Web browser requires a Java plugin compatible with gcc32 (such as Sun j2re 1.4.2). > > Michael Young > > > -- > Rhl-beta-list mailing list > Rhl-beta-list(a)redhat.com > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhl-beta-list >

1 0

submitting bugs?
by M A Young 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

Has bugzilla realised there is a new beta yet? I can't see any obvious category for the new beta, the closest match probably being rawhide. While I am writing this perhaps people can comment whether my problem really is a bug. The issue is that if you had added a java plugin (in my case the ns610 one from 1.4.2) to /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins so it worked under shrike, mozilla won't start after you upgrade it - the fix is to replace the plugin with the ns610-gcc32 plugin instead. Michael Young

5 4

request for gnome 2.3.x RPMs
by Marius Andreiana 21 Jul '03

21 Jul '03

Hi As you know the new red hat beta doesn't bring too much new stuff for desktop users. I was hoping for gnome 2.3.x and open office 1.1rc1. But we also can change that. RHL enters feature-freeze on august 8. Gnome 2.4 final should be available on september 10, 5 days before last rhl-beta release. http://www.gnome.org/start/2.3/ http://rhl.redhat.com/participate/schedule/ So at the begining of August we would have to know gnome 2.3.x major and normal bugs. We would have to start using gnome 2.3.x on rhl-beta and, if time allows, walk through bugzilla.gnome.org to help with bug sorting. Therefore I'm making a request for gnome 2.3.x RPMs for rhl-beta ( or even shrike ), so more desktop-orientented users could test them. Is anyone willing to build them asap ( and also has the resources and knowledge for this ) ? See what would be new in nautilus for example : http://www.gnomedesktop.org/article.php?sid=1198 Thank you, -- Marius Andreiana Soluţii informatice bazate pe Linux / Linux-based IT solutions www.galuna.ro

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test July 2003