March 2009 - test - Fedora Mailing-Lists

New F11 "Compat" and "Unknown" scope addresses on tun6to4?

by Allen Kistler

I've set up a virtual test box with two NICs, one to be Internet facing (simulated, eth1 below) and one intranet facing (eth0 below). I configured 6to4 to tunnel IPv6 traffic through an IPv4-only test ISP. The tun6to4 setup provided by scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts is adding IPv4-compatible IPv6 addresses for all the IPv4 addresses to the tunnel. Here's the (truncated for brevity) ifconfig output. eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:8C:47:72 inet addr:172.16.9.7 Bcast:172.16.9.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: 2002:101:102:1:20c:29ff:fe8c:4772/16 Scope:Global inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe8c:4772/64 Scope:Link eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:29:8C:47:7C inet addr:1.1.1.2 Bcast:1.1.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::20c:29ff:fe8c:477c/64 Scope:Link lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host tun6to4 Link encap:IPv6-in-IPv4 inet6 addr: 2002:101:102::1/16 Scope:Global inet6 addr: ::1.1.1.2/96 Scope:Compat inet6 addr: ::172.16.9.7/96 Scope:Compat inet6 addr: ::127.0.0.1/96 Scope:Unknown What's up with the Compat and Unknown scope addresses? Generally speaking, they shouldn't be there. Absolutely the loopback and RFC1918 addresses shouldn't be there. For reference, nothing other than the 6to4 address (2002::/16) is there in F9 and RHEL5. (I haven't used F10, so I can't comment on it.) Did somebody (would somebody) actually *want* the current F11 behavior, or is it a bug? I'm inclined to think "bug," but I figured I'd ask before I BZ it. Perspective? Knowledge? Anyone?

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

adopting bugbot

by John Poelstra

How do we invite bugbot to come and live at #fedora-bugzappers? John

15 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

Testing Fedora 11 Alpha on the HP tx2000z Tablet PC.. Yes Virginia WACOM Works Out of The Box

by Rahul Sundaram

Hi Just a quick review that I am passing along http://www.securemind.org/v4/?p=379 Rahul

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Newest Bugzappah

by Mike Chambers

Hello all, I am a newbie zapper to the group. I have been around awhile though, actually using Red Hat since 5.2 or 6.0, can't remember. Was a member of the Red Hat Beta Program group for few years before Fedora was formed (for those of you that remember that stuff hehe). Not a developer and/or packager/maintainer or anything, just power user I guess. Trying to find more ways to help contribute and this should be one of them. Besides, I hate those reports that says "this don't work, fix it" and they don't provide info or anything, grrrrrrr! Anyways, I do have a day job that pays the bills, 6am-3:30pm (CST), so that usually leaves me some time in evenings (some longer than others) to help out and maybe weekends providing we don't work on Saturdays (as we often do actually). So hopefully I can help out on way or another. Soo, thanks for having me, and um, er, do I get a zapper gun n stuff too? :P -- Mike Chambers Fedora Project - Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc.. mikec302(a)fedoraproject.org

15 years, 1 month

5
7
0 / 0

um ... what's with the "." after the directory perms?

by Robert P. J. Day

yes, i'm sure i'm about to embarrass myself here but i just checked some directory perms created while root and they display as drwxr-xr-x. ^ ???? what's that period? i've never seen that before. or have i just not been paying attention? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry: Have classroom, will lecture. http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA ========================================================================

15 years, 1 month

10
14
0 / 0

Rawhide grc fails to run

by Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX

Missing critical module: "wx" repeat by: type "grc" from the shell The grc in Fedora 10 does not have this problem. -- Chuck Forsberg caf(a)omen.com www.omen.com 503-614-0430 Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 FAX 629-0665

15 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

tomcat not starting with tomcat-native installed on x86_64

by Bruno Medeiros

People, Some time ago i reported a bug in fedora 9 about this subject, and it's still open. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455543 This bug continues on fedora 10 (i gave a try some months ago) and want to ask two things: 1st: Should i report a new bug to fedora 10 or just comment on the existing fodora 9's bug. 2nd: This problem affects tomcat5 and tomcat6, and it's probably caused by tomcat-native package. Which one should i use on the bug report? Thanks, Bruno Medeiros.

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Apache + mod_ldap seg faulting

by Bruno Medeiros

Hi, People! Recently i tried to set up a svn server with ldap authentication and waste a lot of time to solve the problem i found. As described here, http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/fedora-35/apache-modldap-seg-faul... the fedora 10 apache come with the mod_ldap enable by default, but the package apr-util-ldap, which is required to mod_ldap work, is not mapped as httpd dependency. The seg fault error in apache`s log doesn`t give any clue about the problem, only this thread above helped me. Should i report a package bug or any other bug? where can i do that? Thanks, Bruno Medeiros

15 years, 1 month

3
3
0 / 0

Fedora 10 updates-testing report

by updates＠fedoraproject.org

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 10 updates-testing bugzilla-3.2.2-2.fc10 Details about builds: ================================================================================ bugzilla-3.2.2-2.fc10 (FEDORA-2009-2417) Bug tracking system -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ChangeLog: * Thu Mar 5 2009 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 3.2.2-2 - fix from BZ #474250 Comment #16, from Chris Eveleigh --> - add python BR for contrib subpackage - fix description - change Requires perl-SOAP-Lite to perl(SOAP::Lite) according guidelines * Sun Mar 1 2009 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 3.2.2-1 - thanks to Chris Eveleigh <chris dot eveleigh at planningportal dot gov dot uk> - for contributing with patches :-) - Upgrade to upstream 3.2.2 to fix multiple security vulns - Removed old perl_requires exclusions, added new ones for RADIUS, Oracle and sanitycheck.cgi - Added Oracle to supported DBs in description (and moved line breaks) - Include a patch to fix max_allowed_packet warnin when using with mysql * Sat Feb 28 2009 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 3.0.8-1 - Upgrade to 3.0.8, fix #466077 #438080 - fix macro in changelog rpmlint warning - fix files-attr-not-set rpmlint warning for doc and contrib sub-packages * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 3.0.4-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 2 2009 Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> - 3.0.4-3 - do not require perl-Email-Simple, it is (no longer) in use - remove several explicit perl-* requires; the automatic dependencies do handle them -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- References: [ 1 ] Bug #465956 - CVE-2008-4437 bugzilla directory traversal flaw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465956 [ 2 ] Bug #484755 - CVE-2008-6098 bugzilla: quip moderation bypass for authenticated users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484755 [ 3 ] Bug #484805 - CVE-2009-0481 bugzilla: XSS vulnerability via HTML and JavaScript attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484805 [ 4 ] Bug #484807 - CVE-2009-0483 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via editkeywords.cgi and userprefs.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484807 [ 5 ] Bug #484811 - CVE-2009-0484 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via buglist.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484811 [ 6 ] Bug #484812 - CVE-2009-0485 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via editflagtypes.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484812 [ 7 ] Bug #484813 - CVE-2009-0486 bugzilla: CSRF protection bypass when running under mod_perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484813 [ 8 ] Bug #484806 - CVE-2009-0482 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via process_bug.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484806 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 9 updates-testing report

by updates＠fedoraproject.org

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 9 updates-testing bugzilla-3.2.2-2.fc9 Details about builds: ================================================================================ bugzilla-3.2.2-2.fc9 (FEDORA-2009-2418) Bug tracking system -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ChangeLog: * Thu Mar 5 2009 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 3.2.2-2 - fix from BZ #474250 Comment #16, from Chris Eveleigh --> - add python BR for contrib subpackage - fix description - change Requires perl-SOAP-Lite to perl(SOAP::Lite) according guidelines * Sun Mar 1 2009 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 3.2.2-1 - thanks to Chris Eveleigh <chris dot eveleigh at planningportal dot gov dot uk> - for contributing with patches :-) - Upgrade to upstream 3.2.2 to fix multiple security vulns - Removed old perl_requires exclusions, added new ones for RADIUS, Oracle and sanitycheck.cgi - Added Oracle to supported DBs in description (and moved line breaks) - Include a patch to fix max_allowed_packet warnin when using with mysql * Sat Feb 28 2009 Itamar Reis Peixoto <itamar(a)ispbrasil.com.br> 3.0.8-1 - Upgrade to 3.0.8, fix #466077 #438080 - fix macro in changelog rpmlint warning - fix files-attr-not-set rpmlint warning for doc and contrib sub-packages * Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 3.0.4-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Feb 2 2009 Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> - 3.0.4-3 - do not require perl-Email-Simple, it is (no longer) in use - remove several explicit perl-* requires; the automatic dependencies do handle them * Mon Jul 14 2008 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa(a)redhat.com> - 3.0.4-2 - fix license tag -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- References: [ 1 ] Bug #465956 - CVE-2008-4437 bugzilla directory traversal flaw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465956 [ 2 ] Bug #484755 - CVE-2008-6098 bugzilla: quip moderation bypass for authenticated users https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484755 [ 3 ] Bug #484805 - CVE-2009-0481 bugzilla: XSS vulnerability via HTML and JavaScript attachments https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484805 [ 4 ] Bug #484807 - CVE-2009-0483 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via editkeywords.cgi and userprefs.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484807 [ 5 ] Bug #484811 - CVE-2009-0484 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via buglist.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484811 [ 6 ] Bug #484812 - CVE-2009-0485 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via editflagtypes.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484812 [ 7 ] Bug #484813 - CVE-2009-0486 bugzilla: CSRF protection bypass when running under mod_perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484813 [ 8 ] Bug #484806 - CVE-2009-0482 bugzilla: CSRF vuln via process_bug.cgi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484806 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test March 2009