[Fedora QA] #472: create testcase for resizing in custom partitioning
by fedora-badges
#472: create testcase for resizing in custom partitioning
------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Test cases | Version:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
------------------------+------------------------
After discovering https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221247 it
seems reasonable we should test this more properly in the future.
Currently we seem to have no test case about resizing partitions in manual
part dialog. We probably should, and test it against at least a standard
partition and a logical volume. Optionally, we can split standard
partitions into ext4 and ntfs, to cover similar use cases as in our
QA:Testcase_partitioning_guided_shrink .
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/472>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
4 years, 1 month
[Fedora QA] #474: Proposed Test Day - i18n
by fedora-badges
#474: Proposed Test Day - i18n
----------------------+------------------------
Reporter: tagoh | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 23
Component: Test Day | Version:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
----------------------+------------------------
After discussing the schedule of i18n test day in the fedora i18n meeting
yesterday, we have agreed to have it 1st of September.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/474>
Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
Fedora Quality Assurance
4 years, 7 months
Re: digikam and kipi-plugins?
by Rex Dieter
Per Bothner wrote:
> The Rawhide version of digikam is the very latest (0.10.0-rc1),
> but it fails to find any of the "Kipi plugins", even though I've
> installed the kipi-plugins package. This might be an upstream
> issue, since 0.10.0 is pretty bleeding edge and the kipi-plugins
> may even more bleeding-edge. Gwenview does seem to be see the
> plugins, so I'm wondering if there is there might be a
> Fedora-specific problem before I complain upstream ...
The f10 builds seem to work fine for me (finding the plugins), so perhaps
this is rawhide-specific?
To be clear, digikam's Settings -> configure digikam -> Kipi Plugins is
empty?
-- Rex
4 years, 10 months
Mouse Wheel gone
by Christian Menzel
Since the latest xorg-X11 upgrade I receive the already mentioned XKB
error and the mouse wheel is not working anymore.
Has anybody seen this behavior?
Regards
Chris
4 years, 10 months
Re: NFS failure
by Fulko.Hew＠sita.aero
Damian Menscher <menscher(a)uiuc.edu>@redhat.com on 04/07/2004 04:57:13 PM
wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Jeff Elkins wrote:
>
> > I'm getting failure messages on my nfs mounts i.e. :
> >
> > mount to NFS server 'music.elkins' failed: server is down.
> >
> > nsfd appears to be running and I didn't see anything suspicious in the
logs.
> > The servers are up and running and have other clients connected.
>
> You didn't mention what steps you took to debug it:
>
> Can you ping the server?
> What is the output of rpcinfo -p servername?
> Does the server have access restrictions (firewall, TCP Wrappers, etc)?
I have the same symptoms...
rpcinfo says that nfs et.al. are running.
Something has changed in test 2, since the same PC running RH9
accesses that host just fine.
4 years, 10 months
Criteria / validation test proposal: Installer help screens
by Adam Williamson
Hi folks! So as we noticed today, we have no test case / criterion to
ensure the anaconda help actually works. (Note it was only introduced
in Fedora 21 or 22). I have written a test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_help
and I'm proposing we add a Final criterion:
* Any element in the installer interface(s) which is clearly intended
to display 'help' text must do so correctly when activated.
We could also require that the intended 'Help' elements must be
present, but that's a slightly tighter requirement - I'd ask for the
anaconda team's opinion on whether we should do that or not. If we
don't do that, then if by some chance the Help buttons were entirely
*absent*, that would not be a blocker - only if buttons are present but
don't work would it be a blocker.
I'm proposing we add the criterion, and add the test case to the
'Miscellaneous' table of the Installation matrix.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
4 years, 10 months
