# F10 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-09-16
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.…
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 1
proposed blocker for Final.
Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time
in your local time:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+41+Blocker…
The meeting will be on Matrix. Click the link above to join in a web
client - you can authenticate with your FAS account - or use a
dedicated client of your choosing.
If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .
Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If
you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links
labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions.
Those links take you to tickets where you can vote.
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how
exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the
meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs
where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS
MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!**
We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F40 can be found on the
wiki [0].
For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process,
check out these links:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good day and see you tomorrow!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
Hello All,
We're excited to invite testers to participate in the testing of the new *Tuned
Power Daemon* in Fedora 41, which will soon become the default power
profile daemon. This new feature aims to improve power management by
offering more efficient power-saving profiles and enhanced customization
options. Your feedback will be instrumental in ensuring a smooth transition
from the previous power-profiles-daemon to Tuned. Whether you're a seasoned
tester or new to Fedora, your contributions will help identify any bugs and
refine this feature to offer the best experience for all Fedora users. Join
us in shaping the future of power management in Fedora 41!
Wiki for Test Day :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-09-09_Fedora_41_Tuned
Results App Page : https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/196
--
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED <https://redhat.com/trusted>
# F10 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-09-09
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.…
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 1
proposed blocker and 10 proposed freeze exceptions for Beta.
Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time
in your local time:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+41+Blocker…
The meeting will be on Matrix. Click the link above to join in a web
client - you can authenticate with your FAS account - or use a
dedicated client of your choosing.
If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .
Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If
you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links
labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions.
Those links take you to tickets where you can vote.
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how
exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the
meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs
where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS
MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!**
Especially since we have so many proposed FEs right now, it would
really help make the meeting shorter if people can vote on them today.
We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F40 can be found on the
wiki [0].
For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process,
check out these links:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good day and see you tomorrow!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
I am finding that dnfdragora does not launch in Fedora 41 under Xfce.
I am seeing this problem on systems upgraded to Fedora 41 from 40, and
also on a new instance built from
Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-41-20240826.n.1.iso.
It isn't getting to the stage of creating the ~/.config/dnfdragora.yaml
file (on the upgraded system I delete the file because in the past it
has been known to cause some different versions of dnfdragora to crash).
There is a BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2310097
I wonder if this should be a freeze exception?
Ian
--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
Did run through a full update with dnf4 on my Fedora 40 i3 Spin
install to 41 i3 spin (Pre Release) and nothing exploded on my
ThinkPad Edge 0217A16 laptop
https://i.imgur.com/vReaIwy.png
Den tis 3 sep. 2024 kl 10:38 skrev Luna Jernberg <droidbittin(a)gmail.com>:
>
> Odd as i also had problems with RPMFusion
> but removed it and then it works, just updated 1.3GB of Fedora 40
> updates on my test laptop and now downloading and installing 2.3GB of
> Fedora 41 pre release packages
>
> Den tis 3 sep. 2024 kl 10:09 skrev Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com>:
> >
> > You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
> >
> >
> > Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> > > On 2.09.2024 12:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > > Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > > > and try to run:
> > > > dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync
> > > > I have several packages from RPMFusion so some problems (1, 3, 4, 7,
> > > 9, 10, 11) are related to it:
> > > Problem 1: package ffmpeg-libs-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libjxl.so.0.8()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package ffmpeg-libs-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libjxl.so.0.8(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package ffmpeg-libs-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libjxl_threads.so.0.8()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package ffmpeg-libs-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libjxl_threads.so.0.8(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - libjxl-1:0.8.3-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package ffmpeg-libs-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64
> > > Problem 3: package mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-24.1.6-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires mesa-filesystem(x86-64) = 24.1.6, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - mesa-filesystem-24.1.6-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package mesa-vdpau-drivers-freeworld-24.1.6-1.fc40.x86_64
> > > Problem 4: package python3-rpmfusion-cert-0.7.2-8.fc40.noarch from @System requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - python3-3.12.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package python3-rpmfusion-cert-0.7.2-8.fc40.noarch
> > > Problem 7: package rpmfusion-free-release-40-0.1.noarch from @System requires system-release(40), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - fedora-release-40-39.noarch from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-40-0.1.noarch
> > > Problem 9: package ffmpeg-libs-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libplacebo.so.338()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package ffmpeg-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires ffmpeg-libs(x86-64) = 6.1.2-2.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - libplacebo-6.338.2-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package ffmpeg-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64
> > > Problem 10: package ffmpeg-libs-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libvmaf.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package libavdevice-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires ffmpeg-libs(x86-64) = 6.1.2-2.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - libvmaf-2.3.0-7.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package libavdevice-6.1.2-2.fc40.x86_64
> > > Problem 11: package python3-rpmfusion-cert-0.7.2-8.fc40.noarch from @System requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package python3-3.12.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires python3-libs(x86-64) = 3.12.5-1.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package rpmfusion-packager-0.7.2-8.fc40.noarch from @System requires python3-rpmfusion-cert, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - python3-libs-3.12.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package rpmfusion-packager-0.7.2-8.fc40.noarch
> > > Two are libtiff related:
> > > Problem 12: package alizams-1.9.10-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires libITKCommon-4.13.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package alizams-1.9.10-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires libITKStatistics-4.13.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package alizams-1.9.10-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires libITKTransform-4.13.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires libtiff.so.5(LIBTIFF_4.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libtiff.so.5(LIBTIFF_4.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - problem with installed package alizams-1.9.9-2.fc40.x86_64
> > > - libtiff-4.6.0-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - alizams-1.9.9-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > Problem 14: problem with installed package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from @System requires libtiff.so.5(LIBTIFF_4.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libtiff.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package InsightToolkit-4.13.3-15.fc39.x86_64 from fedora requires libtiff.so.5(LIBTIFF_4.0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - cannot install both libtiff-4.6.0-6.fc41.x86_64 from fedora and libtiff-4.6.0-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System
> > > - package libtiff-devel-4.6.0-6.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires libtiff(x86-64) = 4.6.0-6.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - problem with installed package libtiff-devel-4.6.0-2.fc40.x86_64
> > > - libtiff-devel-4.6.0-2.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > Three are Python issues:
> > > Problem 5: package rfpkg-1.27.3-1.fc40.noarch from @System requires python3.12dist(python-bugzilla), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - python3-bugzilla-3.2.0-10.fc40.noarch from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package rfpkg-1.27.3-1.fc40.noarch
> > > Problem 6: package rfpkgdb-cli-2.15.1-1.fc40.noarch from @System requires python3.12dist(beautifulsoup4), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - python3-beautifulsoup4-4.12.3-3.fc40.noarch from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package rfpkgdb-cli-2.15.1-1.fc40.noarch
> > > Problem 13: problem with installed package python3-devel-3.12.5-1.fc40.x86_64
> > > - package python3-devel-3.13.0~rc1-2.fc41.x86_64 from fedora conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~rc1-2.fc41 provided by python3-3.12.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
> > > - package python3-devel-3.13.0~rc1-3.fc41.x86_64 from updates-testing conflicts with python3 < 3.13.0~rc1-3.fc41 provided by python3-3.12.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System
> > > - package python3-libusb1-3.1.0-1.fc41.noarch from fedora requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - problem with installed package python3-libusb1-3.0.0-9.fc40.noarch
> > > - python3-libusb1-3.0.0-9.fc40.noarch from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - python3-devel-3.12.5-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > And the rest two:
> > > Problem 2: package ghc-foldable1-classes-compat-0.1-4.fc40.x86_64 from @System requires libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - ghc-array-0.5.4.0-142.fc40.x86_64 from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package ghc-foldable1-classes-compat-0.1-4.fc40.x86_64
> > > Problem 8: package fedora-release-40-39.noarch from @System requires fedora-release-common = 40-39, but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-40-0.1.noarch from @System requires system-release(40), but none of the providers can be installed
> > > - fedora-release-common-40-39.noarch from @System does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> > > - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-40-0.1.noarch
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
# F10 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-09-03 (**TUESDAY**)
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.…
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! As Monday
is a holiday in North America, let's do it on Tuesday instead. We have
7 proposed freeze exceptions for Beta.
Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time
in your local time:
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+41+Blocker…
The meeting will be on Matrix. Click the link above to join in a web
client - you can authenticate with your FAS account - or use a
dedicated client of your choosing.
If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or
accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found
here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ .
Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If
you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links
labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions.
Those links take you to tickets where you can vote.
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how
exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the
meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs
where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS
MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!**
We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the
Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not
fixed. Information on the release criteria for F40 can be found on the
wiki [0].
For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process,
check out these links:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting
works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out
the SOP on the wiki:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a holiday weekend and see you on Tuesday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net