test November 2025

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

8 participants
8 discussions

shim-16.1-2 for F43 breaks booting
by Michael Schwendt 18 Nov '25

18 Nov '25

I'm somewhat upset. There's a test-update for "shim" in updates-testing, which breaks booting here. And there is no entry in the Fedora Updates System for this update. WTH? In case the test update has been unpushed, PLEASE don't delete the corresponding bodhi ticket! $ sudo dnf list shim-x64 Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. Installed packages shim-x64.x86_64 15.8-3 fedora Available packages shim-x64.x86_64 16.1-2 updates-testing

3 5

Fedora missing AV1 on Intel with own default drivers
by lejeczek 18 Nov '25

18 Nov '25

HI @devel guys. Did you notice that with with default out-of-box install Fedora is missing... -> $ vainfo Trying display: wayland libva info: VA-API version 1.22.0 libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib64/dri-nonfree/iHD_drv_video.so libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib64/dri-freeworld/iHD_drv_video.so libva info: Trying to open /usr/lib64/dri/iHD_drv_video.so libva info: Found init function __vaDriverInit_1_22 libva info: va_openDriver() returns 0 vainfo: VA-API version: 1.22 (libva 2.22.0) vainfo: Driver version: Intel iHD driver for Intel(R) Gen Graphics - 25.3.4 () vainfo: Supported profile and entrypoints ... VAProfileAV1Profile0 : VAEntrypointEncSliceLP .. the decoder? Encoder is there. It's not a hardware issue - I'm on Intel's ARC A310 - for... it suffices to install: intel-media-driver from RPM Fusion and.. decoder is "back". This makes little sense right - is a bug in my mind - and would be great is you/somebody look into it. It's not a biggie but bit discouraging and needs users to pay attention to, while many of them probably do not and not realize that their Firefox (& every other app?) does not use hardware do decode AV1 with out-of-box installation. thanks, L.

1 0

Re: [Test-Announce]Fedora Release Engineering is migrating to Forgejo!
by Adam Williamson 11 Nov '25

11 Nov '25

On Thu, 2025-11-06 at 16:42 +0530, Samyak Jain via test-announce wrote: > - Once verified, the Pagure issue tracker will be closed and replaced > with a README notice directing users to Forgejo. Could we not implement HTTP redirects for issues and PRs, at least? That would be much nicer. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net

2 2

2025-11-10 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora Quality Meeting
by Kamil Paral 11 Nov '25

11 Nov '25

# Fedora Quality Meeting # Date: 2025-11-10 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#meeting:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=cha… Greetings testers! It's meeting time again. Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time in your local time: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+quality+me… If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this email and suggest them! Thanks. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous meeting follow-up 2. Fedora 44 status 3. Test Day / community event status 4. Open floor

1 1

obsoleting Python package - building fails
by lejeczek 10 Nov '25

10 Nov '25

Hi guys. The .spec I'm trying to rebuild is Centos' one - last few days their mail list block Yahoo I think, there were some issue with Yahoo - thus writing here and because experts are of same family I think. I've done only a few re/builds in my time and this, is new to me - I've sroogled but have failed to get better grip of what's (not)happing here: ... 2 re-run tests: test_mmap test_os Total duration: 3 min 40 sec Tests result: FAILURE then FAILURE error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QX5emT (%check) RPM build errors: line 495: It's not recommended to have unversioned Obsoletes: Obsoletes: python3.9 Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QX5emT (%check) Finish: rpmbuild python3.9-3.9.23-2.el9.src.rpm Finish: build phase for python3.9-3.9.23-2.el9.src.rpm ERROR: Exception(/00-REPOs/dnf.repo/repo/el9/x86_64/packages/python3.9-3.9.23-2.el9.src.rpm) Config(centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64) 12 minutes 9 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /00-REPOs/dnf.repo/repo/el9/x86_64/packages INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True') Start: clean chroot Finish: clean chroot ERROR: Command failed: snippet of the .spec: ... Obsoletes: python%{pybasever} # this is line no. 495 ... Would this be .spec file or something not good with build evn? many thanks, L.

1 0

issues with BTRFS
by lejeczek 05 Nov '25

05 Nov '25

Hi guys. I think 4k LBA - in my case on WD_BLACK SN850X - is something Fedora's default BTRFS cannot handle. My Fedora 43 clean installation, number of them, crashes badly that way, but when I, at another subsequent installation eventually used ext4 instead, then ! ... problems went away. Very same NVMe disk - but with 512b - did not give any problems and I've had it for ~3yrs. thanks, L.

2 1

Self-introduction: Petr Sklenar
by Petr Sklenar 04 Nov '25

04 Nov '25

Hi everyone, I’m really happy to be part of the Fedora QA Team! For many past years, I’ve been working with Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Fedora, mainly focusing on quality engineering and system-level testing. Let me briefly introduce myself. My name is Petr, and I’m from Brno, Czech Republic. You could find me at the Fedora booth during the [openalt] event this past weekend. I’m looking forward to working together and contributing to our projects. My background includes experience with userspace components such as command-line tools, system plumbing, daemons, developer tools, DNS, and printing. Bye and have a nice day! [openalt] https://www.openalt.cz/2025/en/ --- Petr psklenar(a)redhat.com

2 2

Upgrading from F42 to F43 with dnf
by Joachim Backes 03 Nov '25

03 Nov '25

Hi testers, I tried to upgrade from F42 to F43, using dnf. All was fine, but it failed during one of the lasts steps: *sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=43* by the following messages: Testing offline transaction Transaction failed: Rpm transaction failed. - file /usr/lib64/wine/i386-windows from install of wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.x86_64 conflicts with file from package wine-core-10.15-1.fc42.x86_64 - file /usr/lib/wine/i386-windows/ddraw.dll conflicts between attempted installs of wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.i686 and wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.x86_64 - file /usr/lib/wine/i386-windows/urlmon.dll conflicts between attempted installs of wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.i686 and wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.x86_64 - file /usr/lib/wine/i386-windows/windows.devices.bluetooth.dll conflicts between attempted installs of wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.i686 and wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.x86_64 - file /usr/lib/wine/i386-windows/wined3d.dll conflicts between attempted installs of wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.i686 and wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.x86_64 - file /usr/lib/wine/i386-windows/winmm.dll conflicts between attempted installs of wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.i686 and wine-core-10.15-1.fc43.x86_64 How solve this problem? Kind regards Joachim Backes -- Fedora release 42 (Adams) 6.17.4-200.fc42.x86_64 Joachim Backes<joachim.backes(a)rhrk.uni-kl.de>

3 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test November 2025