On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 08:25 +0200, Giulio (juliuxpigface) wrote:
Il 17/Lug/2015 01:11, "Fedora QA"
<trac(a)fedorahosted.org> ha scritto:
>
> #476: Proposed Test Day - Cinnamon Spin
> ----------------------+------------------------
> Reporter: grinnz | Owner:
> Type: task | Status: new
> Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 23
> Component: Test Day | Version:
> Keywords: | Blocked By:
> Blocking: |
> ----------------------+------------------------
> It would be awesome if the QA team could setup a test day for the
> new
> Cinnamon spin. I don't have a preference on the date.
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Cinnamon_Spin
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/476>
> Fedora QA <
http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa>
> Fedora Quality Assurance
> --
> test mailing list
> test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
This was also dicussed in a recent meeting and, as said there, it
will be a
great chance to engage people for testing.
We might also discuss about the modality: since the standard test
cases
will be tested by us during release validation, I'd rather write a
call for
a sort of exploratory testing. Increasing people's freedom with the
flexibility of exploratory testing, we might receive a broader
coverage.
My idea is to include a reference to the standard testcases inside
the wiki
page, but not to flag them as mandatory during the TestDay, in order
to get
some exploratory efforts.
What do other QA folks think about it?
Have a nice day
Sure, this is a very good approach. There's no such thing as
'mandatory' for a test day really :), but we've often had ones where we
list some test cases and also explicitly ask for exploratory testing
and provide a space for reporting the results.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net