On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:49:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> +1. Release notes outside of the artifact (like, online) are
> helpful anyway because they can be updated with late-breaking concerns.
> I'd be surprised if people even think to look at local release notes.
Well, the modification I just applied already removes the requirement
for the notes to be on the media. The change I'm proposing now is
effectively to add "...but if there ARE release notes on the media,
they must be the correct ones", as that's kind of left out at present.
Oh, sorry -- I read too quickly and I'm doing too many things at once.
I'd like to consider dropping packaged release notes entirely -- but if
we have them, the should be the right version.
I think we should _have_ release notes and that be an overall blocker
at the Go/No-Go meeting and tracked by the FPgM, but I don't see much
value in having them in the repository. Possibly the existing notes
package could be replaced by a simple document pointing to the docs
Fedora Project Leader