On Thu, 2020-04-16 at 16:16 +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
I use the functionality daily, so I'm biased, same as mattdm. I
consider it
really a basic desktop functionality. On our home laptop, my wife never
logs out. Why would she, she just closes the lid and the laptop goes to
sleep. When I want to do something, I simply log it as my own user, do what
I need, and again shut the lid. I reboot the laptop twice a month when I
apply updates. There is almost never just a single user logged in. The idea
that we only validate Fedora for a single-user scenario, where the whole
system can be used just by a single user at any moment, feels... almost
obscene given our UNIX heritage :-) In the past when we had some user
switching issues, it was a huge pain for me, because my wife will never
remember Ctrl+Alt+Fx shortcuts to workaround a framebuffer switching
problem. And constantly making sure the other person is not logged in, and
asking him/her to log out if he/she is, is nothing but a headache. It makes
the home laptop use case completely broken. Not to mention it's really hard
to answer her questions about why we're using something that broken.
My use case is slightly different. I like to be able to log into a
basic user configuration to test something, without logging out of my
current session. That second desktop might even be running Gnome rather
than KDE. Would that also count as a blocker?
poc