On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:10 PM Adam Williamson
Thoughts? Is this an improvement? Anyone have a better idea? Thanks!
This is a definite improvement. I agree with Kamil's comment about
including the "graphically" wording. It might be unnecessarily
pedantic, but our future selves may appreciate the clarity of intent.
Additionally, for Fedora Workstation on the x86_64 architecture,
'''all''' applications that are installed by default and can be
launched using the standard graphical mechanism must meet this requirement.
We might make a similar edit to the "all combos" wording, too:
For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following
graphical applications must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test:
This shows that we mean, for example, nautilus and not tar.
Stylistically, I like the idea of making the list of application types
and the examples given below into a table. That seems easier to
understand, although I see arguments for leaving it as-is. I suggest
this change, but will not lobby for it beyond this suggestion. :-)
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager