On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:10 PM Adam Williamson
<adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
Thoughts? Is this an improvement? Anyone have a better idea? Thanks!
This is a definite improvement. I agree with Kamil's comment about
including the "graphically" wording. It might be unnecessarily
pedantic, but our future selves may appreciate the clarity of intent.
Perhaps:
Additionally, for Fedora Workstation on the x86_64 architecture,
'''all''' applications that are installed by default and can be
launched using the standard graphical mechanism must meet this requirement.
We might make a similar edit to the "all combos" wording, too:
For all release-blocking desktop / arch combinations, the following
graphical applications must start successfully and withstand a basic functionality test:
This shows that we mean, for example, nautilus and not tar.
Stylistically, I like the idea of making the list of application types
and the examples given below into a table. That seems easier to
understand, although I see arguments for leaving it as-is. I suggest
this change, but will not lobby for it beyond this suggestion. :-)
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis