On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 06:38 +0500, A. Mani wrote:
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 3:55 AM, Adam Williamson
<awilliam(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria
My comments:
"10. # The installer must be able to successfully complete an upgrade
installation from a clean, fully updated default installation of the
previous stable Fedora release, either via preupgrade or by booting to
the installer manually "
It should be from at least ten other rawhide stages too.
Why is it so weak?
That's all we can commit to test at present. Also, upgrading from
Rawhide is something we care far less about; after all, all Rawhide
installations should be disposable, so one not being upgradeable really
isn't a big deal.
Criteria 11 of beta should figure in alpha. The rescue feature
should
be absolutely robust.
That's a possibility - James, John, what do you guys think of this?
Anyone else?
Criteria 15 can be more specific. Which desktops?.. all of Kde, Xfce
and Gnome
It specifically says 'default desktop' and that is all it's intended to
cover. See John Poelstra's post to -devel-list about the difficulties of
covering multiple desktops in the criteria.
Software Compilation from source and important rpm-src packages
should
be ok at beta stage.
that sounds like a good idea too - again, any other opinions on this?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net