On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:36:16 -0800
Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
<snip>
#2 MOAR METADATA
----------------
The alternative is to make the existing Blocker trackers do more work.
In this model we wouldn't add any new tracker bugs; we'd just add new
'magic words' in the Whiteboard field. Right now, an accepted blocker
is identified by the string 'AcceptedBlocker' appearing in the
whiteboard field. We could simply add some more magical strings like
that: 'Accepted0Day' and 'AcceptedStable', say (better suggestions
welcome).
I kind of like this idea as it's less change and involves creating
fewer new bugs. We'd have to make some changes to blockerbugs either
way - tflink can say if either approach would be more work in
blockerbugs, but I'm gonna guess they'd be fairly similar.
Yeah, I think that either approach would involve a similar amount of
effort to change blockerbugs. #2 would be slightly less effort but
it's not much.
Once the approach is decided, we can file RFEs for blockerbugs and get
that work landed before F24 alpha.
Tim