>The VOTE must be only +1 or -1. Indecisive people do not need to
that down, they just can do nothing.
Haha. In defense of 0, there is a long history of "abstain" votes. There
may be a proposal that someone doesn't support, but also doesn't want to
stand in the way of progression, i.e. it's better to move forward with
something they don't fully like, than it is to be a stick in the mud.
Well, I don't really see a difference between "voting 0" and
nothing". Kamil's idea to use it to see if people have or have not voted
yet makes some sense to me.
I agree that it is better to move forward somehow, but I think that voting
0 is exactly the way to get stuck in the mud, as you are saying. In my
opinion, if I want to move things forward, they way to go is to vote +1 (or
-1) even if I am not fully convinced. It is necessary to make a decision.
Voting 0, in my world, means that I absolutely do not know which way I want
to support and therefore doing nothing is the same as voting 0.
As I already said, I support this asynchronous meetings, so this one only
is a cosmetic thing and having a zero will not block me to use the system
test mailing list -- test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
FEDORA QE, RHCE
612 45 Brno - Královo Pole
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED. <https://redhat.com/trusted>