> We've had 800x600 as the expected minimum for _years_.  Like, since it
> was called Red Hat Linux.  It's not even a particularly egregious
> assumption, that's the fallback resolution for Windows 2k and later, and
> it's the Gnome HIG minimum design size.
> That's why anaconda has a fixed-size UI, and why that fixed size happens
> to be 800x600.

imho, 800x600 should be used only as the last option, if resolution detection fails, and i assume detection doesn't fail that often.

Linux counter #213090