On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 16:42 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 12:44 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As I've said, if people are willing to actually go out and do that, then
> fine. Does desktop team actively curate the DVD-installed package set?
> And to play the counter-factual game: imagine there had been a bug
> analogous to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040922 in
> GNOME on the day of Go/No-Go meeting. Is the desktop SIG willing to take
> a stand and say 'yes, we should delay the release multiple weeks over
> Christmas if such a bug is discovered'?
>
> If so, then we can continue with the current criteria, though it would
> be ideal if desktop and KDE sigs could commit to helping with the
> testing.
No, I take pretty much the same stance wrt. to the DVD: I pay attention
to the live image, and make sure it works. I don't think I've ever
downloaded or tried the DVD. I always found it very odd and awkward that
we hand out something at conferences and shows that nobody really pays
attention to.
Well, then there's the problem. We can't have release criteria that say
"we really stand behind the package sets installed from the DVD" if we
don't.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net