On 2/25/08, Alan <alan(a)clueserver.org> wrote:
>
> the context here might make this question inappropriate, but i
> installed f9 alpha inside virtualbox in two different ways, with only
> one difference -- whether the all-encompassing root file system was
> encrypted or not.
>
> within virtualbox, the encrypted VM is *waaaaay* slower than the
> unencrypted one. should i expect the same performance difference with
> regular hard disk installs? just curious. i expected a difference
> but this is *hugely* noticeable and almost unusable.
That sounds like an artifact of virtualbox. I am using full disk
encryption on F9 alpha and I am seeing little, if any, slowdown. Maybe
64-bit helps.
Same here, on i686.
Jeff